HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Class Racer Builds
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2013, 09:40 PM   #1
Tod Lane
Member
 
Tod Lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default 1992 mustang 2.3 naturally aspirated potential?

This has the fuel injected motor' distributor less ignition with two plugs per cyl.
Rated at 125 HP in the guide at 2658 pounds, the car is a five speed stick. Its the two door coupe body.
__________________
Tod Lane
Swartz & Lane 66 Nova
Swartz & Lane 79 H/CM Trans Am

Last edited by Tod Lane; 09-05-2013 at 09:42 PM.
Tod Lane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2013, 10:34 PM   #2
Joe Toller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lewistown, Montana
Posts: 550
Likes: 78
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: 1992 mustang 2.3 naturally aspirated potential?

From what I have read and what the roundy-rounders say that is the best head for the 2.3. Hop up pieces like a header and cam gear are cheap through circle track outlets. Lots of chassis options for cheap too. A few guys over on the Stang forums mess with them.
Joe Toller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2013, 10:49 PM   #3
Tod Lane
Member
 
Tod Lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: 1992 mustang 2.3 naturally aspirated potential?

I should clarify, I meant potential as an NHRA stocker, as a dime rocket
__________________
Tod Lane
Swartz & Lane 66 Nova
Swartz & Lane 79 H/CM Trans Am
Tod Lane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2013, 08:14 AM   #4
Sean Marconette
Senior Member
 
Sean Marconette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 958
Likes: 617
Liked 165 Times in 60 Posts
Default Re: 1992 mustang 2.3 naturally aspirated potential?

Tod,
There have been a couple 2.3's in stock that were naturally aspirated, but earlier years. They were competitive and dime rockets if I recall, they were auto's though. Gear selection to wind them up is something to keep in mind for the stick. The dual plug head is a common swap as stated with the turbo coupe and other fox body crowd, so it must be a decent head. What trans and clutch are you thinking about?
Good luck sounds cool.

Sean
__________________
Sean Marconette
84 Mustang
5060 SS/N
Sean Marconette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2013, 09:23 AM   #5
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 3,091
Liked 6,772 Times in 1,519 Posts
Default Re: 1992 mustang 2.3 naturally aspirated potential?

I think that it's got plenty of potential but I don't see it being a "Dime Rocket".
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

Make tech "TECH" again!
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2013, 09:55 AM   #6
Tod Lane
Member
 
Tod Lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: 1992 mustang 2.3 naturally aspirated potential?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
I think that it's got plenty of potential but I don't see it being a "Dime Rocket".
As I research it I see what you mean lol, I found the MSD box is around five hundred bucks new by it's self! Half what it took you for a whole car to get under the index!
__________________
Tod Lane
Swartz & Lane 66 Nova
Swartz & Lane 79 H/CM Trans Am
Tod Lane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2013, 10:56 AM   #7
Ron Middleton
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Jackson, Ms.
Posts: 350
Likes: 183
Liked 10 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: 1992 mustang 2.3 naturally aspirated potential?

Tod,
I played with an auto version of this car for a little while locally and did pretty well at bracket racing with it. Motor was reringed but stock other than that and had about 20k miles on freshening up. 4.56 gear in stock 7.5 rear end with stock 4ald trans with 175k miles on it. With nothing other than cone filter and gear and weighing almost 3250 lbs. with me in it the car ran 10.7 to 10.9 1/8 mile times with P275/60-15R street tire and full stock exhaust. I think potential is there and can be done reasonably. JMT.
__________________
#4892 J/SA. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act, but a habit.”
- Aristotle
Ron Middleton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2013, 04:38 PM   #8
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,989
Likes: 690
Liked 1,453 Times in 541 Posts
Default Re: 1992 mustang 2.3 naturally aspirated potential?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Marconette View Post
Tod,
There have been a couple 2.3's in stock that were naturally aspirated, but earlier years. They were competitive and dime rockets if I recall, they were auto's though. Gear selection to wind them up is something to keep in mind for the stick. The dual plug head is a common swap as stated with the turbo coupe and other fox body crowd, so it must be a decent head. What trans and clutch are you thinking about?
Good luck sounds cool.

Sean
With the 8.8 rear, you have a good selection and if you really want to wind up the RPM's, Yukon makes a 5.71 gear set!
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2013, 07:55 PM   #9
Robert Swartz
Senior Member
 
Robert Swartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nineveh, Indiana
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 1992 mustang 2.3 naturally aspirated potential?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tod Lane View Post
This has the fuel injected motor' distributor less ignition with two plugs per cyl.
Rated at 125 HP in the guide at 2658 pounds, the car is a five speed stick. Its the two door coupe body.
Just to jump in and get this going a bit more. although it's going into the weekend. We all (should) have things to do, cars to work on, race, the usual.

At 2658, and 125 horsepower, that computes out at 21.26, a natural U car. U weight with a driver, 2670. U weight starts at a 20 pound minimum. U index at 14.65/9.17. Doing a little motor math, you're looking at approximately 168hp to hit the index.

We can bump it up to V, which is a 22 pound break. V weight with a driver, about 2750. V index at 15.25/9.65. Same little formula for power, looking at approximately 153hp to run the index.

I also did the comparisons for an automatic car as well. It would take comparable power for the car to run those index's.

Tod and I chewed on all this last Sunday morning. It's a two door notch car. From the picture, paint looks fair. It's a 20+ year old used car, like all, imagine it has it's share of used car issues. You sure don't buy one of these things if you don't expect to work on it, LOL!

My thoughts on it. I'm positive a 2300 can be made to run. I know of one, an earlier version that's being prepped right now. Have no idea when that car will see the light of day. I really don't know if "this" version of the 2300 can run.

On the plus side, there's a ton of parts for these things. Be easy to put an 8.8 rear under it. Plenty of suspension parts. No shortage of engine parts for them. My reservation is it being a stick. You could put a bulletproof transmission, flywheel, clutch and pressure plate behind this thing. Probably never make enough power to hurt it! To be a competitve NHRA car, it would have to run deep into the 14's for V, deep into the 13's for U. On paper, I'd say a 2.3 is capable of this, just not certain this 2.3 is capable.

Like everything else in this game, how much do you want or have you got to spend?
__________________
Robert Swartz - Swartz & Lane 66 Chevy II Pro
95 Achieva EF/SA, 78 Mustang II U/SA (work in progress) #354 stock
Robert Swartz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2013, 05:57 PM   #10
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 2,579
Liked 4,447 Times in 1,693 Posts
Default Re: 1992 mustang 2.3 naturally aspirated potential?

Nah..Don't like it.
Get an 88 Notchback...97 hp...Falls way heavy in W , but if you build it right, you should be able to get it light enough.
Not sure if 5.13 would be enough gear though..Maybe ,at 2600 # ,with short slick
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.