HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Bracket Racing


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-29-2015, 12:26 PM   #1
targus
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Cowl Hood vs Snorkel Scoop

I currently have a forward facing snorkel scoop on a 68 camaro. The car currently runs 9.30s and the hood has an air pan sealing it to the carb. Currently there is approximately 1.5" of clearance from the carb to the top of the scoop. We are debating putting a 6" cowl hood on, just for looks but i am now questioning the performance difference that it could make.

So my questions are, what are the differences that you have seen between cowl induction hoods and forward facing scoops?

Also, what is the difference between the older square style snorkel scoops and the newer aeroscoops?
targus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 03:47 PM   #2
Jim Caughlin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 634
Likes: 70
Liked 691 Times in 207 Posts
Default Re: Cowl Hood vs Snorkel Scoop

Anything less than 2" top of carb to bottom of scoop clearance will affect performance, this has been proven on dynos.

In my case, just removing the seal between the carb and the front facing hoodscoop slows the car by almost a tenth.

In the case of Stockers that have cowl hoods, they have been proven to have zero performance gain over a flat hood even when the carb is sealed to the scoop. They effectively are no more than a carb cover.

I don't care for the looks of front opening snorkel hoodscoops but there is no question that they are the best for performance.

Jim Caughlin
SS 6019
Jim Caughlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2015, 10:37 PM   #3
Eric Crawford
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Cowl Hood vs Snorkel Scoop

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Caughlin View Post
Anything less than 2" top of carb to bottom of scoop clearance will affect performance, this has been proven on dynos.

In my case, just removing the seal between the carb and the front facing hoodscoop slows the car by almost a tenth.

In the case of Stockers that have cowl hoods, they have been proven to have zero performance gain over a flat hood even when the carb is sealed to the scoop. They effectively are no more than a carb cover.

I don't care for the looks of front opening snorkel hoodscoops but there is no question that they are the best for performance.

Jim Caughlin
SS 6019
That's good to know. I was thinking of putting the air pan back on my car when it gets back together. (Cowl hood) I may not even worry about it now.
Eric Crawford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2015, 10:00 AM   #4
oneowner73
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Cowl Hood vs Snorkel Scoop

If your cowl extends very close to your windshield you will be in a high pressure area created by the air turning up the windshield. Changing directions causes resistance creating pressure. If your cowl is too far from the windshield it works like a draw tube like header evac systems. I went from no air box with my 6" cowl to an unsealed box and ran the same et and 1 mph faster in 1000' worse air in the 1/8 mile.
oneowner73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2015, 07:13 PM   #5
RON NICKELS
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Cowl Hood vs Snorkel Scoop

If cowl hood scoops worked better than a frt. air scoops ,pro stock cars would be running a cowl hood lol.
RON NICKELS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2015, 10:25 PM   #6
Bill Baer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Nothern IL
Posts: 596
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Cowl Hood vs Snorkel Scoop

"but there is no question that they (snorkel scoops) are the best for performance." Yep.

Neither will work well unless you seal the scoop to the carb there's a ton of hot air coming thru the radiator.
__________________
Bill Baer 3391 SC, 339B SC, QR

Last edited by Bill Baer; 07-28-2015 at 10:29 PM.
Bill Baer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2015, 05:09 PM   #7
voltdr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 700
Likes: 77
Liked 87 Times in 47 Posts
Default Re: Cowl Hood vs Snorkel Scoop

Unless your MPH is near or above 150, Then the snorkel scoop doesn't care where it gets its air from, front or rear. The performance increase comes from the cooler intake air versus the engine heated intake air. With most cars, there is such a wall of air you're pushing in front of the car it doesn't know the difference. As long as there isn't a vacuum created by the aero package.
Dan
voltdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2017, 07:58 AM   #8
StickBBF
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Cowl Hood vs Snorkel Scoop

Yeah, this is an old thread, but racing season is here again and it's starting to get warm.... so it's something to discuss once more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Baer View Post
.... there's a ton of hot air coming thru the radiator.
EXACTLY! And hot air is NOT what you want.
In contrast, however, would the non-scooped, underhood air temps likely be less variable? From 3PM to 10PM, outside air temps can vary greatly coming in the scoop. It seems to me that less variable intake air temperatures would equate to less jet changes and be a more consistent overall air/fuel mixture, correct?

StickBBF
StickBBF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 11:15 PM   #9
Marc
Junior Member
 
Marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 57
Likes: 7
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Cowl Hood vs Snorkel Scoop

Quote:
Originally Posted by StickBBF View Post
Yeah, this is an old thread, but racing season is here again and it's starting to get warm.... so it's something to discuss once more.



EXACTLY! And hot air is NOT what you want.
In contrast, however, would the non-scooped, underhood air temps likely be less variable? From 3PM to 10PM, outside air temps can vary greatly coming in the scoop. It seems to me that less variable intake air temperatures would equate to less jet changes and be a more consistent overall air/fuel mixture, correct?

StickBBF
My good racing friend and owner of a racing school would agree with you 100%. He is a big advocate of flat hoods and even recommends those with forward facing scoops to seal them off to improve consistent underhood air temps.
Marc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.