|
09-14-2017, 12:43 PM | #11 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 3,091
Liked 6,772 Times in 1,519 Posts
|
Re: New Rule Revision For Stock and S/S
Yeah, what he^^^^^^^^^^^^ said!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS Make tech "TECH" again! |
09-14-2017, 01:12 PM | #12 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,990
Likes: 690
Liked 1,453 Times in 541 Posts
|
Re: New Rule Revision For Stock and S/S
As I was told, the rule was implemented because the creativity of some racers using a tall bucket seat for the driver and using a short seat on the passenger side to save weight.
|
09-14-2017, 01:16 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 561
Likes: 33
Liked 47 Times in 32 Posts
|
Re: New Rule Revision For Stock and S/S
How much weight savings can you actually get by cutting off the head rest? I think lighter clothes would work just as well. I can't believe with all the other problems out there they would jump on this. Outcry from the fans must be unbearable. Is it high on the list or job justification.
Mike |
09-14-2017, 02:01 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 635
Likes: 70
Liked 693 Times in 208 Posts
|
Re: New Rule Revision For Stock and S/S
I'm thinking that cutting off the passenger headrest is more to get better rear vision than a weight factor. The interesting variation on this is you can use two low back seats and attach the headrest to the roll bar / cage, totally legal.
|
09-14-2017, 02:49 PM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 2,579
Liked 4,447 Times in 1,693 Posts
|
Re: New Rule Revision For Stock and S/S
Actually, I think what's going on here is that certain tech guys that really care about S/SS, see things, for instance at Indy, that are getting way out of control, even more so, if that's possible.
They do what they can, when they can, by reporting on it. They don't have much input on the bogus parts and hp's that are accepted. We know where that comes from. Anyway, thank you for trying, if this is the case.
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers |
09-14-2017, 03:18 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London Ontario
Posts: 515
Likes: 40
Liked 262 Times in 74 Posts
|
Re: New Rule Revision For Stock and S/S
I agree Mark, But while they are in Stock and I'm being caught at 150 mph, I'm seriously thinking of putting a 6 point in the Escort. Mainly because I'm not keen on the idea of picking a Bowtie or Blue Oval out of my ***. Ask Marty Buth about his experience, with a Cobra Jet crossing lanes.
__________________
Steve Polhill 3520 STOCK, COMP |
09-14-2017, 03:48 PM | #17 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
|
Re: New Rule Revision For Stock and S/S
Quote:
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS |
|
09-14-2017, 04:04 PM | #18 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 52
Liked 724 Times in 177 Posts
|
Re: New Rule Revision For Stock and S/S
Rules allow you to put a roll bar in any stocker if you want to.
__________________
|
09-14-2017, 04:50 PM | #19 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario, calif
Posts: 208
Likes: 51
Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: New Rule Revision For Stock and S/S
Quote:
__________________
Joe Schweigert 751 SS |
|
09-14-2017, 05:00 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 270
Likes: 49
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: New Rule Revision For Stock and S/S
When I first saw these cut down aftermarket seats in a "Stocker" (photo from indy 2017) I thought the owner was trying to emulate the look of the o.e.m. low back originals. No big deal.
I'll side with some others here. With all of the bogus crap that has become "Accepted", and "cut down aftermarket" or "mismatched driver - passenger seats" becomes worthy of a midseason "rule" change? Unbelievable.
__________________
Larry Fulton |
|
|