|
06-30-2013, 01:44 PM | #16 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 1,078
Liked 180 Times in 110 Posts
|
Re: 1965 Impala BBC I/S
Quote:
Yes the 58 got the X-frame as GM began installing heavier engines. GM always boosted about the ride quality. The Lower Links were angled toward the X-Frame and no Panhard Bar. This frame required 2 - short drive shafts and a Center Link prone to snapping. (I know that so well) 65 - 76 went to H - Frame 4 Link set up with Panhard Bar. Spring set on the Lower Suspension Link. Used much heavier U-joints. Then 77 up to 96 D / B Body used the earlier 1964 & up Chevelle/BOP Mid sized car H-Frame set up. Upper Control Arms were angled eliminating the Panhard Bar. Spring mounted on the Axle. The 91-96 used a 8.5inch 10bolt that has a history of being very rugged. Someone said you can put a larger 8.75 12 bolt Carrier in it. Never understood why they were not put in Camaro/FB? The Drive shaft rarely had any issues. U-Joints lasted the life of the car regardless of abuse. For racing gears just needed a balancing and the weight tab removed from the Yoke...and still keeping the original U-joints. On my 1995 Impala SS purchased a Dick Miller Frame Connector for the upper and lower control arms. Think he makes it for the Plus Sized cars too. Hope this helps.. D |
|
|
|