HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Class Racer Builds


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2015, 09:26 PM   #21
HP HUNTER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 606
Likes: 68
Liked 238 Times in 97 Posts
Default Re: Peanut Port Drag Test

Update: I ran the car at Bandimere in some 8800 DA conditions, 24.24 baro. I was able to figure out the off idle stumble and was able to run a 1.47 60, 6.95 660, 11.05 1320 on Sunday, If I could have figured out the carb Saturday when the baro was a whole 24.38 and had my 29.5s on there surely I would have seen some 10s.
HP HUNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2015, 08:00 PM   #22
jcw31
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Peanut Port Drag Test

HP how would it have compared if you ran the next bigger cam 238/248 114?
jcw31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2015, 11:44 PM   #23
HP HUNTER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 606
Likes: 68
Liked 238 Times in 97 Posts
Default Re: Peanut Port Drag Test

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcw31 View Post
HP how would it have compared if you ran the next bigger cam 238/248 114?
I had 9.3 compression, I think it would be slower, but I don't know.
HP HUNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2016, 12:03 PM   #24
HP HUNTER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 606
Likes: 68
Liked 238 Times in 97 Posts
Default Re: Peanut Port Drag Test

Update,


I had the peanut port out this weekend at Pueblo, 25.10 baro, 7000 DA, made suspension adjustments, along with 29.5 Hoosiers and ran the following

60 1.42
330 4.35
660 6.82
660 98.8
1320 10.86
1320 120.4
HP HUNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 06:22 PM   #25
pfordamx
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 214
Likes: 3
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: Peanut Port Drag Test

I'm really impressed your horsepower and weight make that seem like a 11.20 combo not a high to mid 10 second combo. someone knows how to build a efficient car that works. nice job
pfordamx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2016, 08:39 AM   #26
impstocker
Member
 
impstocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wingdale, NY
Posts: 302
Likes: 27
Liked 54 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Peanut Port Drag Test

Great runs. Pretty impressive.

Have you ever done any work with the 366 truck motor? I know it is a high deck block, but we noticed it has smaller Main Journal size 2.50 like a 409 motor.

Does anybody know if this motor listed in the NHRA guide? Probaly not since it only came in dump truck/buses.

Will
impstocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2016, 03:01 PM   #27
jcw31
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Peanut Port Drag Test

HP is this the same engine combo with no changes as last year? Also if you had to make changes would you use a cam with a tighter lobe sep. ? What icl is the present one in at?What if you wanted to make more upper hp but not kill the bottom to increase the back half.Seems like you are running as fast as some alum. head roller cam more comp. engines.How about some thoughts on this.Most builders would cringe at a 114 ls.
jcw31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2016, 08:25 AM   #28
HP HUNTER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 606
Likes: 68
Liked 238 Times in 97 Posts
Default Re: Peanut Port Drag Test

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcw31 View Post
HP is this the same engine combo with no changes as last year? Also if you had to make changes would you use a cam with a tighter lobe sep. ? What icl is the present one in at?What if you wanted to make more upper hp but not kill the bottom to increase the back half.Seems like you are running as fast as some alum. head roller cam more comp. engines.How about some thoughts on this.Most builders would cringe at a 114 ls.

It is the same combination as last year, just dialed in now, low 10s. The cam was used to keep the engine as close to what I sell as possible, the cam has great vacuum and works great in a street driver. There is better cam choices when it comes to the track for sure. I feel I've maxed the combo out and its time to move on to my 620 HP oval port combo, I think you will like that cam, 108 LC, peaks @ 6600 RPM, the peanut port peaked @ 5900, although it ran through @ 6900 RPM. Stay tuned....
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3210.JPG
Views:	244
Size:	193.8 KB
ID:	35385   Click image for larger version

Name:	my peanut port 467.jpg
Views:	300
Size:	188.6 KB
ID:	35386  

Last edited by HP HUNTER; 08-05-2016 at 08:34 AM.
HP HUNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2016, 09:12 AM   #29
jcw31
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Peanut Port Drag Test

It ran 10.80s at 7000 da is this corrected or what would you expect at 2000 da
jcw31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2016, 09:50 AM   #30
Mike Taylor 3601
VIP Member
 
Mike Taylor 3601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 198
Liked 116 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: Peanut Port Drag Test

Quote:
Originally Posted by impstocker View Post
Great runs. Pretty impressive.

Have you ever done any work with the 366 truck motor? I know it is a high deck block, but we noticed it has smaller Main Journal size 2.50 like a 409 motor.

Does anybody know if this motor listed in the NHRA guide? Probaly not since it only came in dump truck/buses.

Will
366 has same main journal size as other BBC don't know of many ever doing anything much with them,had a friend ran them years ago in Super stock 4wd pulling,they had 366'' limit,they made the rules don't guess they thought of anyone building 366'' BBC, he dominated it.
About all we have ever done besides build them back stock, is use the cranks,in 396,427's and use the rods for stock rebuilds.
366 wouldn't be good for any kind of budget build,by the time you had custom pistons made that would be more than the difference in $ of 454/427 block,could build bigger for same or less money.

HP,I like your build.

Mike Taylor 3601

Last edited by Mike Taylor 3601; 08-05-2016 at 09:52 AM.
Mike Taylor 3601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.