|
06-18-2014, 01:42 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Cast vs. Steel Crankshaft
I would like an opinion from the engine builders on CR.
We run a BBC in a 4200 lb. car. One of our motors had a cast crank and the other had a forged steel crank. There are two schools of thought regarding cast vs. steel. The cast crank is lighter which in turn reduces the reciprocating mass of the engine producing more power. The other school of thought is to use a heavier steel crankshaft to keep the rotational momentum of the motor high due to the heavy weight of the car. Anyone have experience on this subject?
__________________
Nelson Kowal Stock 345 |
06-18-2014, 03:12 PM | #2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lakewood Washington
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 29
Liked 236 Times in 127 Posts
|
Re: Cast vs. Steel Crankshaft
My school of thought is simple. Forged is stronger than cast - they are both steel - and my block is worth a lot to me. Crankshaft and rods are nothing but forged 4130 steel. I intend to leave nothing on the track but rubber.
Dale
__________________
Dale Shearon 68 Mustang 6394 |
06-18-2014, 06:48 PM | #3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
|
Re: Cast vs. Steel Crankshaft
Quote:
The reduction of the reciprocating weight will allow the engine to accelerate quicker. You can purchase a steel crankshaft that is as light as a cast iron piece. |
|
|
|