HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2007, 01:08 PM   #1
maliburacer78
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 66 chevelle carb question

Hi, I am thinking of running my 66 chevelle in stock eliminator. On NHRA's web site under engine specifications, it shows a 275 hp 327 to have a holley carburetor (also the 300 hp). Is this correct?? I always thought it would've had a q-jet. Also do you have to have a factory bench seat in the front if it came with one??

Thanks, Brian

maliburacer78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2007, 02:44 PM   #2
Bill Belden
Member
 
Bill Belden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: York, PA
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

327/275 is a Q-jet motor
Bucket seats were optional, must use original not aftermarket


1100 I/S
__________________
Bill Belden
Retired Stock Eliminator
[emailSTK1100@comcast.net[/email]
Bill Belden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2007, 04:18 PM   #3
Chuck Norton
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Covina, CA
Posts: 469
Likes: 79
Liked 69 Times in 15 Posts
Default

Brian,

I believe that the '66 327, 275 hp combination is relatively unique in that you have a choice of three carburetor manufacturers. Sub-note #8 on the tech page indicates the availability of:

Alt carbs - Cart AVS-4027S/SM 4028S/PG Roch 4MV-7026203/SM 7026202/PG

It is my recollection that the overwhelming majority of Stock and S/S cars running this combination use the Quadrajet. Having said that, you clearly have the option to use either the Rochester, the Holley, or the Carter.

c

__________________
Chuck Norton
Chuck Norton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2007, 06:02 PM   #4
bsa633
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

chuck...was there a midseason change at chevrolet that year or....396-325 also have the holley option that year of 66?

bsa633 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2007, 06:38 PM   #5
maliburacer78
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks everyone!!

maliburacer78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2007, 09:44 PM   #6
Chuck Norton
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Covina, CA
Posts: 469
Likes: 79
Liked 69 Times in 15 Posts
Default

633,

I can't claim any particular expertise as a automotive historian of that era. However, to the best of my admittedly fuzzy memory, I recall that 1966 marked the introduction of the 275 horsepower combination and that most of at least the early cars were Holley equipped. Cars that were delivered in California weren't necessarily equipped the same as cars in the other 49 states. We even had the A.I.R. systems to complicate things. Obviously, the Holley was the originally specified carburetor because it is in the primary spot on the spec sheet. The Carter AVS was basically viewed as a re-engineered version of the AFB and many racers initially tended to approach the "air-door" carburetors as being less desirable. I personally never saw an AVS equipped 275 horsepower 327. Also, there may have been some factory equipped Q-jet cars in 1966 but I don't remember them. Travis Miller could probably shed light on this point but I seem to recall that after the Q-jet was put on the '67 275, it may have been approved for the '66 retroactively. (Note the revision to the spec sheet dated 8/23/79.)

Earlier in the mid-sixties, I recall that the Chevy V8 combinations had used AFB Carters, Holley's various sizes in single-feed configurations or, in the case of smaller horsepower units, the Rochester 4GC. Exactly why GM spent the money to build molds to cast two different manifolds (apparently Holley and Carter carbs both used the same casting) for the same engine configuration is a mystery to me. On the 396 side of the ledger, in 1966 there is a manifold that has the name "Holley" cast into the unit and that motor carried ten more horsepower than the very similar Q-jet combination of 1967.

Having scrambled through what's left of my rapidly evaporating memory to dredge up the foregoing, I'm in no position to declare it as totally accurate or complete. Just the way I remember it.

c

__________________
Chuck Norton
Chuck Norton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 06:46 AM   #7
bsa633
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

thanks Chuck! as always...a lot of meat! i'll take your "fuzzy" memory over mine...anytime....CYA

bsa633 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 10:59 AM   #8
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 53
Liked 724 Times in 177 Posts
Default

Chuck -

My "fuzzy" memory seems to recall in days of yore that the different carbs were related to the car model the engine was installed in. Seems the Chevy II used to be restricted to the Holley carb, the Chevelle could use the Holley or Cater and the full-size car used the Q-jet. Like I said, this is fuzzy. But, for the early years of Stock-SS (up until mid-70's), you never saw a '66 Chevy II with a 327 becasue of the carb restriction. I don't know when or why it changed. This may all be just distorted synapses from years of packing data, not getting enough sleep and stress that has accumulated into a total fabrication, too.

Does anyone else remember such?

Dwight Southerland

__________________
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 11:07 AM   #9
Chuck Norton
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Covina, CA
Posts: 469
Likes: 79
Liked 69 Times in 15 Posts
Default

Dwight,

That makes sense. I do recall considering running a 275 horsepower combo in my '66 Nova stocker in about 1975 and going instead with a 283 for a variety of reasons, including the carburetor. Since I didn't pay a lot of attention to Chevelles and big cars, it could have been the case that they had different equipment. I'm sure that Travis knows!

c

__________________
Chuck Norton
Chuck Norton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.