|
![]() |
#51 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 6
Liked 58 Times in 28 Posts
|
![]()
I agree with you Dave. My suspicion is that he grade point will probably make a lot of difference.
__________________
Chris Bowman The Mountain State Mustang 1984 Mustang GT350 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I bought my 95 Mustang PS right off a car lot with the sole intention of turning it into a Pure Stocker. Rear gear change, driveshaft loop, a shift kit, and verify the engine was stock. Car still has the stock torque convertor. Ran right on the I/PS index at my 1st IHRA race for under $ 4,800. Plus I can still drive it around town. ; ![]()
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT Last edited by ALMACK; 02-07-2016 at 05:27 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 98
Liked 324 Times in 116 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Well said. Good post. I'm just glad to see NHRA receptive to the idea of allowing the IHRA cars to run.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ontario,canada
Posts: 438
Likes: 63
Liked 64 Times in 28 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Im extremely exited that IHRA cars will be allowed to run. Hopefully it will open NHRAs eyes and allow us crate motor stockers to run more often. I think the whole "crate motor" name gets confused with some people. Other then a different casting head, intake and carb these cars are identical to traditional stockers. Same bottom end, same camshaft with a lift rule. For example my H/CM Camaro 350/330hp (334 re-rated) that uses a 9.5 weight to rated HP and a 11.95 index is 98% the same as a G or H/SA car.
__________________
Tony Valerio 1968 Camaro 1700 IHRA H/CM 1701 NHRA SS/?A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Tony Valerio 1968 Camaro 1700 IHRA H/CM 1701 NHRA SS/?A |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 751
Likes: 204
Liked 133 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
__________________
Tony Valerio 1968 Camaro 1700 IHRA H/CM 1701 NHRA SS/?A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 389 Times in 168 Posts
|
![]()
Why would a guy not build a car that fit classes with both HRAs in the first place, if he wanted to be able to run it anywhere? Instead of expecting one HRA to change rules to suit them?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 162
Likes: 5
Liked 10 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
For the same reason a guy would oppose one HRA or the other making a move to open up opportunities to more "racers" ....... Let's spend less time on the school yard and more time supporting class racing . In any form
__________________
F Federico NHRA J/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|