|
![]() |
#51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, Indiana
Posts: 519
Likes: 144
Liked 301 Times in 73 Posts
|
![]()
I say if you want Aluminum heads find a combination that uses them and go with it. If your brand doesn't provide such a thing, you know your options. Don't press the issue, for all other racers to have to invest in new heads and associated work, to appease your own interests.
Oh, I do have an aluminum head combination. Watch those valve seats! Ernie Neal SS3400 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 162
Likes: 252
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
There are plenty of late model engine combos available to run in Super Stock. If you can't find the heads you need at an affordable price, try running something that you can find heads for. If aluminum heads are made legal across for all Super Stocks, then everyone has obsolete heads and the market dries up to sell the heads that everyone has alot of time and money into. It just makes Super Stock racing that much more expensive. The AHFS can't adjust the horsepower factors now, let alone if you add more Aluminum heads to the game. Keep things the way they are.
__________________
ss/gt 93 t-bird |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Keep things the way they are?
I'm wondering if the SS/GT class was created (in part) because the 40 year old bodies were getting hard / expensive to come by? Take the same gripes about aluminum heads and apply it to the GT classes. Seems like the issues are nearly identical.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CARMEL, INDIANA
Posts: 141
Likes: 69
Liked 49 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I think thats the step but then you cross the line on how to shape it and where would u hit water and how it would have to be welded. They deemed it too much of an advantage to play with the shape. When you have a 9.5 to 1 engine I dont think it matters that much anyway. There are way more LIBERAL scenario's out there than that but I think there point is once you do it for one then you set a precedent for them all. I think a lot of these are mistakes like the 400 sbc head for years. The officials are professionally careful in my opinion, so change come very slowly. We may get consideration as the aftermarket wave progresses. Just the diverse opinions of this thread are an example of what these guys go through with letters and phonecalls everyday. We do need to keep the old combos affordable and competitive. It seems to be increasingly difficult to expect the factory's to maintain this. The aftermarket playing field will take over...but gradually. Not as a advantage medium but a survival one. Headn to Vegas!! Stacy GTAA Last edited by PONTIAC'S REVENGE; 10-20-2009 at 04:07 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,965
Likes: 1,092
Liked 1,192 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
You're wrong Jim. Period. We "Chevy guys" have to buy our heads through GM, and the bare castings cost every bit as much as any Edelbrock aluminum bare casting legal for NHRA Stock Eliminator. Sorry, try again.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I dont think the "eye for eye" approach really works here..how much i hate seing "All Edelbrock" Ford 390's with deep pans)in stock .(how on earth could all this ever been approved?)..the ones that allready are in the system we can do nothing about but in the future i would rather see approving parts done with care depending on the(real) need..rather than acrross the board just to satisfy the hunger for performance that some have.. p.s.The Chevy B.B Head you have to angle mill and do all sorts of things to get it legal..so i dont see why the Pontiac issue would be any different in that case.. Last edited by bsa633; 10-21-2009 at 05:07 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Buying cast or aluminum heads will always be more expensive for Mopars, Buicks, Ramblers, etc. than Chevys. It's a market thing...the more you sell the less profit you need to make per item, the less you sell the more expensive the item will be .....and it doesn't matter who you bought them from.
__________________
Jim Rountree |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 4,965
Likes: 1,092
Liked 1,192 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
And BSA 633 is right, if you use the GMPP 401 head to replace the old cast iron closed chamber head, it requires $2000 worth of work, including reaming the guides, angle milling the head, spot facing the bolt holes, and correcting the angle on the intake flange. And I'm NOT advocating opening up the rules to allow more aftermarket stuff in Stock or Super Stock. All I'm doing here is correcting some seriously incorrect information.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by 69ss/rs; 10-21-2009 at 07:06 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|