|
![]() |
#41 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]()
Quote Mark:
I still don't see the down side here. Qualifying is done of the index anyway, which is automatically entered from the tech cards. It seems like a simple software change to stagger the start. The pair takes the same amount of time to run and then clear the track..that being the ET of the slower car. Am I missing something? Has anyone asked a DD why they haven't tried it? Markie, because the idiots in Glendora and the Div. offices dont give a rats ***. Also (for the 2 millionth tie) the fan base isn't what it used to be.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 923
Likes: 101
Liked 101 Times in 52 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Unless someone considers more attendance watching Stock/Super Stock qualifying an issue. Since the indexes are already in the software it would be a simple update. As mentioned there is NO increase in time, we still can't run the next pair until the slower car gets off the track. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#43 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,683 Times in 1,731 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|