Some "Dime Rockets" for the 4TH!

[GTX JOHN]

[QUOTE=Mark Yacavone;610939]Yeah! Now, if they'd let you deep stage it .. ;-)[/QUsOTE]

Just take two bumps and hope the top bulb stays on.....
How I run the N/O/P Aspen 318 Wagon!
It got me to Finals at Sonoma couple years back.

[89bird]

Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland

Okay, since I have already let the cat out of the bag on the other thread, I will start with my favorite, the '76 or '77 Camaro, '78 Camaro LT or '78 Firebird Formula, or '79 Camaro Berlinetta with a 305 2-bbl for U/SA. The pluses for this combination and the potential makes it a must look at in my opinion.

The engine is basically the same as the one Billy Lynn and Dean Oliver race in their Malibus in K & L. The only difference is the carb and a smaller intake valve (which may be a plus with the smaller carb!). Those Malibus run 11.80s consistently at 3250 lbs, so we can get a guage on the potential of the U combination from that. If you allow that the switch to a 2-bbl will chop a full second off and the added weight for U (3770 lbs. minimum) will slow by another .6 or so, the U combination should run mid 13s in a class with a 15.15 index. I see lots of potential there to be a competitor.

Then, consider that the 200 Metric or 200R4 is available and the car will be equipped with a GM 8.5" ten bolt. The 200 is a transmission of choice in lots of classes and the 8.5 is plenty strong enough with stock parts for this combo. The body has leaf springs so traction is easy and the plethora of available bolt-ons makes used parts easy to find. There have been several racers over the years chase combinations using the Rochester 2-bbl, so even the carb is not exactly an unknown.

I see lots of affordable potential in these combinations. I think the big problem for most people would be resisting the temptation to go overboard with the cosmetics and tricks that are available and applicable for the engine and car.

What gear and converter would you use and would you need c clip eliminator thanks

[89bird]

What are the thoughts on a 76 trans am with a Pontiac motor in it, 8.5 ten bolt, th400 trans would it make a buget minded stocker.

[Tim H]

TH400 "eats" up a lot of HP ... just sayin' . Also a TH350 has a better 1st gear in a budget build.

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by 89bird

What are the thoughts on a 76 trans am with a Pontiac motor in it, 8.5 ten bolt, th400 trans would it make a buget minded stocker.

Which engine ? Neither one is particularly great. The 400 would be okay in L/SA , where there are not a lot of cars to bother you.
Forget the 400..Look around for a T350 with a 2.75 low and some light parts...Minimum.

[89bird]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

Which engine ? Neither one is particularly great. The 400 would be okay in L/SA , where there are not a lot of cars to bother you.
Forget the 400..Look around for a T350 with a 2.75 low and some light parts...Minimum.

My apologies it's a th350, and the motor is a 1969 Pontiac 350

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by 89bird

My apologies it's a th350, and the motor is a 1969 Pontiac 350

Okay...so what engine do you plan on running though?

[89bird]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

Okay...so what engine do you plan on running though?

I guess I'm stuck with a pontiac, I was told 78 was the only year you can run a chevy motor but I dont no how true that is. Trying to make my stuff work seems like a upward battle

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by 89bird

I guess I'm stuck with a pontiac,

Things could be worse, my friend.

[89bird]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

Things could be worse, my friend.

Lol but seriously thanks Mark and everyone else on here I have learned a lot by just reading these posts