|
![]() |
#31 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hampden, MA
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 233
Liked 797 Times in 165 Posts
|
![]()
I like the 319,200,140 idea, but you and I have tractor motors that few stick guys have. I like the 308 in my 400/427 stocker. Your car is 400 lbs heavier, but you have the rear gear to offset that. Todd,s thought on leaving lower with more 1st gear is certainly a good one, and his combo is closer to what you have, worth trying, and easy to switch 308 to a 319
__________________
Dave Casey 1330 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 583
Likes: 8
Liked 54 Times in 27 Posts
|
![]()
I like the ratios that I got with the 3.08 first, and if I went to 3.19 first, I would still want about the same for second and third as I have now (1.93, 1.34). The engine seems to recover a lot easier in the lower gears, and a wide 3-4 seems to slow down the engine's building rpm. About the worst was the old M20 with its 1.48 or 1.46 third ratio.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,123
Likes: 1,580
Liked 1,864 Times in 422 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yeah, that also fits in with the fact that he has changed to the correct theory on camshafts now, I'm betting he'll find more power and more RPM working with the correct lobe designs. That gearing combination will allow him to put the gains he'll make in the future to good use. Not breaking valvetrain components will allow him to race the car and learn, instead of trying to keep it in one piece and running. Racing is about to get much more fun!
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Member
|
![]()
I like your optimism, Alan !
Thanks again, everybody. I'm going to get back on the phone with Jerico, and come up with a combination based on what I'm hearing here. I DO want to stop breaking the engine because of the valve train... while not choosing a gear combination that will break the transmission ! My daughter is getting married on a cruise ship, touring between Italy and Spain. HHHMMM.... May have to settle for on a row boat in our local pond.
__________________
Aubrey N Bruneau 6409 C/S 62 BelAir sport coupe, 409 HP 409 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
If I were you....
Take a wide path around those rocky shores(no short cuts) and find out the captians name. You might also ask him if he is kin to another well know boat captian that runs over rocks. ![]() If you get the wrong answer I would settle for the row boat!!
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 04-02-2014 at 01:28 AM. Reason: sp |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Member
|
![]()
Oh, that's just great, Adger.... the flight is going to be bad enough !
just give me 4 wheels ... and a clutch pedal !
__________________
Aubrey N Bruneau 6409 C/S 62 BelAir sport coupe, 409 HP 409 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Moncton, N.B.
Posts: 276
Likes: 24
Liked 24 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
Aubrey, I assume you will be going from a "DR4" to a "DR4 Rev 4".
Would like to know if you find any difference in the two. Best of luck, Terry K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Member
|
![]()
Absolutely, there's a difference...
about $2000.00 ! ! !
__________________
Aubrey N Bruneau 6409 C/S 62 BelAir sport coupe, 409 HP 409 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sumas Wa
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I would have to agree with the steeper first gear as well.. Also have you considered a Gforce. I have had great luck working with Bubba 1-717-202-8367. I hope you make it to mission its great to see you and your car..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
X2 on the Gforce. Top notch people to work with, and a great reliable product
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|