Just a thought.... - Page 4

Ken Haase · 03-09-2010, 12:05 PM

Here's the very first sentence from this thread:

Ok this is a "legality" question, for OPINIONS, not a definitive answer.

Now, from the most recent post:

I dont mind or really even feel people are attacking, I asked a question, simple, I didnt get an answer that was valid and on topic , that was what I found annoying, it took about a month and a lot of interm garbage, to get the answer someone finally provided, nothing more.

So, which was it? Opinions, or "an answer that was valid and on topic" ?

I wish I had a 'buck' for every time someone on here was given the advice " get a copy of the rulebook and read it cover to cover". I don't see any reason why you should not follow the same advice. It wouldn't have taken very long to come across the definition of how to interpret the rulebook that Jerry quoted.

You probably could skip the sections for the nitro classes, unless you have higher (or is that lower) aspirations. And the E.T. sections. You could have your club membership revoked for that.

Chris "drooze" Wertman · 03-09-2010, 05:32 PM

In UNIX we have a saying any newbie when asking a question is told RTFM (Read the F**king Manual) On that note I have read the rules before I even frequented this site cover to cover on at least 3 occasion, re-read Stock and Superstock about 10 additional times each, and the General Regs about 5.

So in answer to that I have.....What I was looking for was something I had missed.

"But is it legal ? Or more accuratley would it be per the interpretation fo the rules, or is there something I am missing that specifically disallows it."

I have read , and reread it and missed it, its a big book in small type.

You said, "So, which was it? Opinions, or "an answer that was valid and on topic" ?" I was looking for On Topic Opinions, not opinions on how this or that completley unrelated to the thread, is was, or "advice" on things unrlelated, I thought that was clear. I expressley thanked people for the OPINIONS on Topic and said I would take those into consideration in my thougth process.

You probably could skip the sections for the nitro classes, unless you have higher (or is that lower) aspirations. And the E.T. sections. You could have your club membership revoked for that.

Yep , Nitro is next for me, personally, something I will do, next year probably something in Nostalgia Classes, I dig FEDS, and well...why not, that was what I wanted to do this year but well, sidetracked by the old man DP......Ive got all the SFI Specs sitting on my desk.....but that will have to wait. Truth is I dig "Class Racing" more than I thought I would, the rules, the limits, that takes effort and intellegence to conform to. I like that, the FED thatll just be fun.......

Thats all...maybe that clears up what I meant by opinion, I did in fact mean on topic opinions, although I did find humor in several of the other posts....like "WTF Are you smoking" I mean that was funny and some others.

Some others that had to do with our issues, oh well...

Someone said about "Lighting Fires" I would contend that even a beginning arsonist has a few matches blow out, dosent mean the intent isnt there and given when the wind is just right a fire of epic proportions will ensue, now granted sometimes a beginning arsonist ends up becoming a crispy critter by his own device, but well.......I can run REALLY fast when crap is on fire....

Cheers

Chris

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Haase

Here's the very first sentence from this thread:

Ok this is a "legality" question, for OPINIONS, not a definitive answer.

Now, from the most recent post:

I dont mind or really even feel people are attacking, I asked a question, simple, I didnt get an answer that was valid and on topic , that was what I found annoying, it took about a month and a lot of interm garbage, to get the answer someone finally provided, nothing more.

So, which was it? Opinions, or "an answer that was valid and on topic" ?

I wish I had a 'buck' for every time someone on here was given the advice " get a copy of the rulebook and read it cover to cover". I don't see any reason why you should not follow the same advice. It wouldn't have taken very long to come across the definition of how to interpret the rulebook that Jerry quoted.

You probably could skip the sections for the nitro classes, unless you have higher (or is that lower) aspirations. And the E.T. sections. You could have your club membership revoked for that.

03-09-2010, 12:05 PM	#31
Ken Haase Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 233 Likes: 0 Liked 1 Time in 1 Post	Re: Just a thought.... Here's the very first sentence from this thread: Ok this is a "legality" question, for OPINIONS, not a definitive answer. Now, from the most recent post: I dont mind or really even feel people are attacking, I asked a question, simple, I didnt get an answer that was valid and on topic , that was what I found annoying, it took about a month and a lot of interm garbage, to get the answer someone finally provided, nothing more. So, which was it? Opinions, or "an answer that was valid and on topic" ? I wish I had a 'buck' for every time someone on here was given the advice " get a copy of the rulebook and read it cover to cover". I don't see any reason why you should not follow the same advice. It wouldn't have taken very long to come across the definition of how to interpret the rulebook that Jerry quoted. You probably could skip the sections for the nitro classes, unless you have higher (or is that lower) aspirations. And the E.T. sections. You could have your club membership revoked for that.