|
![]() |
#21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Vegas nv
Posts: 600
Likes: 18
Liked 66 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]()
K/SA is a great class! Had a 1.45 last time out so we are inching closer to the 6.99 goal
![]()
__________________
72 cutlass |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Please don't rub salt into the wound. LOL
__________________
Nelson Kowal Stock 345 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: cloquet mn
Posts: 464
Likes: 17
Liked 66 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
400 hp is no problem 425/435 for a killer!!
__________________
Ron Mattson 5015 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 655
Likes: 8
Liked 244 Times in 26 Posts
|
![]()
400 hp is only 1.15 hp/in3 for a 350, so it should easily make 400 hp.
A good one should make north of 450 hp. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pukwana SD
Posts: 860
Likes: 554
Liked 99 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]()
Jim Hughes runs that engine with a stick, and runs pretty good, I think the 402 is a bit harder than the 350 . If you get the right engine builder it should be a fair engine and yes I have worked on a couple. They make about 480 or so.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 371 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Thats pretty accurate, with a peak of 6400 RPM. 488 HP 497 TQ Last edited by HP HUNTER; 06-21-2015 at 10:32 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 63
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]()
Jim Hughes runs a 70 Nova with a 350 hp 402. Different animal than the '71
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Yes the 1970 402 is a way better motor. It also has an intake manifold that has a higher rise which produces better air/fuel flow than the 71 manifold. The 71 intake is flat as a pancake. The 70 engine is also 10.25-1 compression ratio. The 71 engine has a 9:28-1 CR.
__________________
Nelson Kowal Stock 345 Last edited by njk53; 06-22-2015 at 09:57 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 100th Meridian
Posts: 569
Likes: 116
Liked 280 Times in 139 Posts
|
![]()
According to the tech. specs the 70/350 and 71/300 402 both run the same intake (flat #287).In order to get the 300/402 to be competitive you need a custom grind camshaft,if you have one of the "off the shelf" cams your leaving 2 tenths on the table,There basically a 325/396 cam with more ex. lift,but don't compliment the semi-open head (105cc) on the 300/402 which produces low torque #'s.With the right combo,cam/converter/gear,carb,light trans,good ring seal,right tune-up ( jetting,timing etc.) it should run with the majority of the cars in K. JMO gsa612
Last edited by gsa612; 06-23-2015 at 12:20 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 63
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]()
Here's a picture of a 287 manifold. Doesn't look flat to me. The differences between the '70 and '71 engines are the heads (290 heads flow well and have a good combustion chamber design, 820 heads flow okay but the combustion chamber is sucky; not sure about the other '71 heads), camshaft, and 1.7 points of blueprinted compression (11.3 for the '70 and 9.6 for the '71). See www.classracerinfo.com for the actual calculated compression ratios.
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|