Very Interesting!

[Eddies66]

Originally Posted by Billy Nees

Ya know, I'm not seeing it that way. Was he ever "asked" or are you assuming that he was? And even if he WAS "asked" then why weren't Pence, Biden, Obama and Clinton "asked" until after-the-fact. It was just another convenient set-up.

From May 6, 2022 to June 2023 Trump received no less than six requests to return classified material. He failed to do so and warrants were issued and he was indicted with 37 felony counts, including conspiracy to obstruct justice, corruptly concealing a document or record and willful retention of national defense information.

[SStockDart]

From May 6, 2022 to June 2023 Trump allegedly received no less than six requests to return classified material. He allegedly failed to do so and warrants were issued and he was indicted with 37 felony counts, including conspiracy to obstruct justice, corruptly concealing a document or record and willful retention of national defense information. All charges were dropped.

There, fixed it for you.

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by Eddies66

What makes it illegal, the only thing that makes it illegal is the improper storage, access by people who do not have a need to know, and obstruction when requested to turn it over to authorities. Mark don't speak on something you never had access to, makes you look really...I will leave that part to you.

Illegal? Invalid? Referring of course to Jack Smith's appointment.
My point.
But you knew that, being a handler of top secret docs.and a
legal scholar. Or did you just watch one on leftie TV?

[Billy Nees]

Originally Posted by Eddies66

From May 6, 2022 to June 2023 Trump received no less than six requests to return classified material. He failed to do so and warrants were issued and he was indicted with 37 felony counts, including conspiracy to obstruct justice, corruptly concealing a document or record and willful retention of national defense information.

You can of course furnish me with the exact dates that Biden, Obama and the Clintons were "requested" to return their "classified" material right?
Oh wait a minute, THEY returned theirs AFTER Trump was raided and charged.
How long did they have "classified" material? All a set-up.

[Eddies66]

Originally Posted by Billy Nees

You can of course furnish me with the exact dates that Biden, Obama and the Clintons were "requested" to return their "classified" material right?
Oh wait a minute, THEY returned theirs AFTER Trump was raided and charged.
How long did they have "classified" material? All a set-up.

Biden: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...-tied-to-biden


Obama: https://apnews.com/article/fact-chec...s-929954890662


Clinton: https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...t-to-archives/


With Trump it is always a set-up or rigged, you are just gullible to any thing he said. Do your homework!

[Eddies66]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

Illegal? Invalid? Referring of course to Jack Smith's appointment.
My point.
But you knew that, being a handler of top secret docs.and a
legal scholar. Or did you just watch one on leftie TV?

Mark, You just need to stay in your swim lane, if you are good at fixing transmissions that is your field of expertise. I challenge anyone on this site if they have had experience in managing a CMCC, CMS, CMS (4K), EAM, SAS/PAL accounts and passed an NWAI and NTPI audits with "no decrepencies" noted results more than once, to tell me different. The mishandling of TS material can cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security. Do you understand "grave damage"? The nuclear umbrella this nation lives under could be comprised, I take that very serious. Oh, by the way, the DOJ can and will appeal this decision and another judge will be appointed.

[Eddies66]

Originally Posted by SStockDart

From May 6, 2022 to June 2023 Trump allegedly received no less than six requests to return classified material. He allegedly failed to do so and warrants were issued and he was indicted with 37 felony counts, including conspiracy to obstruct justice, corruptly concealing a document or record and willful retention of national defense information. All charges were dropped.

There, fixed it for you.

And you allegedly found this where?

[Stan Weiss]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

Illegal? Invalid? Referring of course to Jack Smith's appointment.
My point.
But you knew that, being a handler of top secret docs.and a
legal scholar. Or did you just watch one on leftie TV?

Lets just wait and see what the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals does with this. They have already overturned Judge Cannon's ruling in this case.


But she has done her job. There will be no trial before the election.



Stan

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by Stan Weiss

Lets just wait and see what the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals does with this. They have already overturned Judge Cannon's ruling in this case.


But she has done her job. There will be no trial before the election.



Stan

Good..because that was the point of these cases .Some, very weak and dredged up.
The doc. case has merit, but seems to only apply to former prez DT
His opponent was deemed too senile to prosecute...Imagine that.

[SStockDart]

CMCC, CMS, CMS (4K), EAM, SAS/PAL and NWAI and NTPI ...
Eee eye eee eye oh. Couldn't help myself Ed.