|
![]() |
#11 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
what modification is not legal? FYI, my MPR built car competed in Super Stock, running GT/AA - GT/HA for 5 years.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Well looks like MPR has pushed the bar up a little. When my car was built in early 2,000 the R&P and the way the front K member is cut out was not allowed. The other car I have is a Quay car and is built different from your MPR. Quay picture attached
I guess things are changing rapidly in the rules dept.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 05-22-2014 at 09:18 AM. Reason: sp |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 421
Likes: 13
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
I used to have a FJ Smith built '94 Mustang for GT and the K member and steering setup looked very similar to 1320racer's modifications. The K member was cut even more than FJ's work when I put an FE engine in it. That work was done by B&B.
__________________
Bill Harris ex 2172 STK ex 2272 S/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 712
Liked 1,566 Times in 579 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
When I proposed a similar solution for a 1994 Mustang Cobra, it was turned down twice by the main office in Glendora. They said the legal modification to the factory crossmember is the way Ed Quay has been doing it as shown in Adger's picture. I even sent pictures of many SS cars that have the mods to the crossmembers with the rack & pinion as shown in Ed's pictures and they just ignored them. Again, there are different rules books and it depends on who builds the car. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|