|
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 221
Likes: 15
Liked 58 Times in 18 Posts
|
![]()
All the info you are asking for is in the classification guide. I don't think there is any difference on the 396 aluminum heads (new or old) but i could be wrong, just be careful if you call it a 402 that changes alot of small stuff.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,095
Likes: 1,541
Liked 1,769 Times in 402 Posts
|
![]()
We have a 427/425 with 401 heads. I would not build another one. If I get the chance, we'll be going to a set of 840 iron heads.
It is a good choice for a ZL-1, an L-88, or a Super Stock engine, and probably for a 396-375 or 402-375 in Stock.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 39
Likes: 5
Liked 69 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
I come from the land of Mopar where things seem a bit easier. That being said, I have to ask a few questions: How did NHRA wind up allowing the "401" aluminum head as a replacement head for the 427/425 iron head combo when it has a 1.845 exhaust valve? Didn't this combo originally come in only one version and that being a 1.725" valve in an iron head? There is also the question about how did NHRA arrive at the smaller chamber volume with the 401 head?
I would gladly stand corrected if any of my information is wrong. Inquiring minds would like to know. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|