|
![]() |
#11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Jeff, that's the SS "hood scoop" cars, right?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 2
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, as Ed said, the index change is only for classes that use the pounds per cubic inch factor like SS modified. -Toby |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Black Creek, BC Canada
Posts: 331
Likes: 77
Liked 172 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
Amazingly, I have had very little input on this subject from any fellow div 6 racers. I do think the proposed changes are a step in the right direction, please let me know what you think.
One additional suggestion I had made is to post the qualifying speed. I am not suggesting those lifting at 1000' should be penalised, just suggesting it would help level the playing field for those us who don't have a crew member to stand at the 1000' mark during qualifying. Jim Mantle, div 6 S/SS SRAC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
283 R.I.P next year lolllllllllllllll
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Us AMC'ers aren't always the smartest bunch but this just goes to show everybody Ed's smarter than I
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Jeff thanks for the pics I have been busy sorry I didnt reply to your e-mail..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]()
As I look into my crystal ball, I can see the future.....
It's Boise or Tucson with a sea level weather condition like we had a few years ago and guess what...... 10 or 20 combos get HP on Tuesday and have to live with it when you are in Div 3 or 4 at sea level in August with a 28.50 baro....... You wanted AHFS at the altitude tracks and now you have to live with the results... ...
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK A & M Motorsports |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,103
Likes: 1,560
Liked 1,782 Times in 406 Posts
|
![]()
I notice there is nothing in that draft to address the weather conditions. If NHRA does nothing to address the problem of weather conditions skewing the AHFS, the AHFS will remain broken, and the racers will continue to be screwed by it.
It's been said repeatedly for years, in order to work properly and fairly, the AHFS system MUST correct ALL data to an SAE standard sea level day. Each Division must have its own regularly calibrated weather station, to be used at the track before and after every session, or the data collected is skewed and worthless. If the average racer can afford a weather station, then NHRA can afford to buy 7 nice ones for their staff, keep them correctly calibrated, and have someone on the starting line record a weather reading before and after each session.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 750
Likes: 175
Liked 189 Times in 48 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Angelo DiTocco '98 Firebird SS/HA '98 Firebird B/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 11-19-2010 at 09:27 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|