|
|
10-31-2010, 11:55 AM
|
#11 |
|
Photographer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 24
Liked 75 Times in 29 Posts
|
Re: "2012 and beyond rule proposals"
My 2012 proposal (or better yet... 2011) is.....
drop the AFHS "trigger review" from current -1.00 to -0.80 drop AFHS "auto hp" to -1.00 (same as 2009- old -1.30) change AFHS review period to every 3 months (with 6 months of data) +++ AFHS- use rolling 6 moths of data (drop 3 months add new 3 months)
__________________
Tom Sheehan SS GT/NA 1046 |
|
|
|
10-31-2010, 12:04 PM
|
#12 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: "2012 and beyond rule proposals"
Quote:
But tear all cars the get the instant hit down. I wish they would use corrected altitude. And use all tracks even the altitude ones. It is totally unfair that someone can go to a altitude track and run 1.5 under and not even get looked at.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2010, 01:49 PM
|
#13 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
Re: "2012 and beyond rule proposals"
Andy, read the rule book. Those things I mentioned are supposed to be the same. Guys with a 4 or 5 year old fwd conversion GT car, built by the rule book are at a disadvantage. If they are going to allow that stuff they should change the rule book.
I agree with Tom and Art about the triggers & altitude tracks. I don't see the 3.25% cap as valid. Should be a % based on the % they ran under the trigger. Should not take so long to correct the really bogus combos.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA Last edited by Ed Wright; 10-31-2010 at 01:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
10-31-2010, 02:04 PM
|
#14 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: "2012 and beyond rule proposals"
Quote:
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2010, 03:04 PM
|
#15 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
Re: "2012 and beyond rule proposals"
Don't forget 1000'ers.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
|
|
|
10-31-2010, 06:55 PM
|
#16 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tempe, Az.
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 918
Liked 238 Times in 94 Posts
  |
Re: "2012 and beyond rule proposals"
I wouldn't mind seeing a proposal to allow an engine that came OEM with fuel injection only, to be able to replace that system with an OEM or aftermarket accepted carburation system. Then I could save my future laptop for stuff like this only....
__________________
Gary Hampton '86 Z24,173 V6 CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021) |
|
|
|
|
10-31-2010, 07:39 PM
|
#17 | |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: "2012 and beyond rule proposals"
Quote:
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2010, 09:59 PM
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Beavercreek Or.
Posts: 272
Likes: 31
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: "2012 and beyond rule proposals"
Allow deep staging in Stock!
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2010, 10:54 PM
|
#19 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ALTA LOMA , CA
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: "2012 and beyond rule proposals"
Get the sb2 heads out of ss/cm -ss/dm and the aurora blocks cant recall a single production vehicle with sbc and a 8.2 -8.5 inch deck
|
|
|
|
|
10-31-2010, 11:05 PM
|
#20 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
Re: "2012 and beyond rule proposals"
Quote:
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
