|
04-13-2014, 03:28 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 108
Likes: 6
Liked 120 Times in 11 Posts
|
Re: Factory Stock Showdown Rule Revisions
I was involved in the meetings for these rules changes. Dale Aldo presented the data for the change for the V10 and I seconded his recommendation based on feedback we both had from V10 owners.
The 50lbs to FS/A was at my request to keep those cars a little further from sub 8.50et's that would require a new cage. I agree the sub 400cid cars could use less weight for 350-360ish combinations. Not sure we could get light enough to be competitive but if you've got one of those combos email me and share your thoughts. There aren't many out there and we tried to keep the weight in the ballpark for the 426/427 and upcoming Ford 429 cars as these are expected to make up the majority of FS/B. Thanks, Jesse
__________________
Jesse Kershaw |
04-13-2014, 04:16 PM | #12 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,696
Likes: 1,812
Liked 1,792 Times in 440 Posts
|
Re: Factory Stock Showdown Rule Revisions
What about an FS/C class with a reasonable index for those combinations?
|
04-13-2014, 09:18 PM | #13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 294
Liked 936 Times in 207 Posts
|
Re: Factory Stock Showdown Rule Revisions
Higher index.
__________________
Brett Candies 4192 Stock/SS God Bless America |
05-05-2014, 12:52 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Factory Stock Showdown Rule Revisions
Quote:
My Drag Pak #24, race ready was 3150 with an 8 3/4 rear, 904 and every bit of soundproofing dug out. David The New Hemi Guy |
|
|
|