|
![]() |
#11 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 481
Liked 716 Times in 276 Posts
|
![]()
OK, Mark...that works.
I was looking for a GM rating of 335..& should have looked at 350 HP specs. Yes, 335 is the rating for the 1968 350 HP 396 with stick shift. What I think I saw is all bodies with stick in 1968 for stock are 335. (Base) I see it has the bigger cam, too. That Dog might hunt with a stick. Thanks for the info... Adger
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 632
Likes: 72
Liked 293 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elysburg, Pa
Posts: 701
Likes: 300
Liked 242 Times in 94 Posts
|
![]()
I'm guessing you didn't flow with the manifold on.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 632
Likes: 72
Liked 293 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]() You would be correct, I simply wanted a base line on the heads as they were run. The 396 was a 440 HP engine as run, I know the factory intake easily supports more than that from other builds I've done in the past. I would be interested in knowing what a worked over intake was worth? I'am pretty sure the heads can be very much improved on, we're going to see soon. https://classracer.com/classforum/sh...ad.php?t=78477 Last edited by HP HUNTER; 05-21-2024 at 12:39 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 632
Likes: 72
Liked 293 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]()
Here's a better picture of the head before work was started. Notice both valves are sunk quite a bit. I checked all the valve heights, and checked PV clearance, CC the chamber 100.5. So according to my calculations its short on compression.
Last edited by HP HUNTER; 05-22-2024 at 09:37 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 632
Likes: 72
Liked 293 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]()
Seats installed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 632
Likes: 72
Liked 293 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]()
Setting height, there's 60 now with a 2.065 valve BBC.............
Last edited by HP HUNTER; 05-23-2024 at 08:49 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 632
Likes: 72
Liked 293 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]()
Intake flow long port now:
.200 153 + 21 .300 214 + 29 .400 250 + 15 .460 262 + 5 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,616
Likes: 2,731
Liked 4,782 Times in 1,815 Posts
|
![]()
I hope you guys are appreciating this.
You could spend 4-6K for a set of Stocker heads and not get this much information.
__________________
Real life never quite adds up.... Jay Farrar |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 759
Likes: 771
Liked 208 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I understand you want all the valve heads the same height in the chamber so with sunk seats, you're replacing the seats and getting all the heads to sit at the same height...got it. But in the picture where you say you have .060, you're measuring from the deck height and what? I can't see but I'm assuming you're going to the top of the seat you installed? Once all valves are sitting in the same place in the chamber, the cc's should be closer to start with...am I on the same page or in left field?
__________________
Jim Miller 103 U/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|