|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hendersonville, TN 37075
Posts: 225
Likes: 4
Liked 44 Times in 20 Posts
|
![]()
Over heard a rumor of Lenco's (planetary style) transmissions being allowed in SS next year. Anyone else hear about this? Supposedly the Hemi cars are pulling for this for 2010.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
I heard something about clutchless trans but running a Lenco is getting out of hand. S/S and stock is almost a joke already not to mention all of the modifications they are doing to the Hemi engine in SS/AH.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Castle, PA
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Excellent! Maybe Mega Blocks and Merlins are next!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Buhler, KS
Posts: 527
Likes: 5
Liked 57 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]()
Why not? I know dad is tired of replacing gears, shafts, forks, sliders, and more gears all the time. Not from breakage, necessarily, just abuse.
While we're at it, titanium valves would be a good idea, also. But there's a million things you could change. Where would you draw the line??
__________________
Mike Voth 5189 GTN - 5188 GTO Voth Racing |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 34
Liked 138 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]()
History keeps repeating itself. Mostly tube chassis and Lencos started to be used in Pro Stock in the early-mid-'70's. And those cars originally started as SS's.
To put things in perspective, the Pro Stock records in the late '70's were in the low to mid 8 second range! (Before the 500" limit.)
__________________
LOCOMOTION Racing Last edited by Myron Piatek; 10-27-2009 at 03:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
And, the last car to hold the lbs./cu.in. Pro Stock MPH record (with MPH arguably being the most reliable HP indicator) was a 383" Hemi, run by John Hagen.
I think the Ford Cleveland was pulling more weight per cube than the Hemi at that time, though, so there's not really any way to compare engines; it's all apples and oranges...
__________________
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 1,281
Liked 1,428 Times in 296 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I don't think the Lenco would be anyone's choice in SS even if it was legal.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 1
Liked 83 Times in 32 Posts
|
![]()
One thing about a Lenco it would never break. Why are guys worried about Lenco's when stick guys arent using the clutch now. They are pulling a lever. I had a lenco 20 years ago and I used it 2 years and sold it for more than I paid for it. It is slower than a clutchless no doubt, but how much is stock anymore anyway. I have a pro trans 904 Chrysler that takes a Chevy Convertor. Its so far out who really cares anymore.
Herb Jr |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Super Stock and Stock eliminator are really getting out of hand. This kind of equipment is more like a modified production class. Where is this going to end? The trans case should be OEM.
If I had my way I would have SS and Stock be a foot brake class; no electronics, no wheelie bars, Schubeck lifters, etc. Bring some normalcy back to the two classes. I would have a more thorough list of OEM options from the factory and not dealer installed items to allow the 55-56-57 Chevys back into stock eliminator.
__________________
Nelson Kowal Stock 345 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Maine
Posts: 49
Likes: 51
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Hopefully "clutchless" is allowed. There is no et/mph advantage by having one. The major advantage is cost. The cost to run a stick is through the roof and going clutchless alleviates alot of the expense. If there is no performance edge it should be allowed. Might make things more economical to hopefully allow more people to run a stick
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|