|
12-24-2021, 10:37 AM | #61 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Donaldsonville, LA
Posts: 969
Likes: 8
Liked 184 Times in 63 Posts
|
Re: New AHFS
Quote:
__________________
Jimmy "Cooter" Hidalgo, Jr. 4865 E/SA '04 GTO 4865 SS/GA '99 Firebird |
|
Liked |
12-24-2021, 11:02 AM | #62 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Indianola Washington
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Liked 396 Times in 126 Posts
|
Re: New AHFS
|
12-24-2021, 11:17 AM | #63 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 329
Likes: 11
Liked 238 Times in 89 Posts
|
Re: New AHFS
|
Liked |
12-24-2021, 01:43 PM | #64 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rainy Washington
Posts: 579
Likes: 4
Liked 131 Times in 51 Posts
|
Re: New AHFS
So here are the facts 3 divisional and 4 National events last year that were Mineshaft
None of them would be considered Mineshaft under the new .950 under rule
__________________
James Boyce 6052 K/SA Stock National record holder 2015,2018,2 times in 2022,2023 |
Liked |
12-24-2021, 05:31 PM | #65 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,669
Likes: 1,731
Liked 1,749 Times in 424 Posts
|
Re: New AHFS
I just spoke with Lonnie about this. I'm not sure how things will play out, but I can say that his heart is in the right place.
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
Liked |
12-25-2021, 01:08 PM | #66 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 836
Likes: 928
Liked 2,325 Times in 456 Posts
|
Re: New AHFS
Quote:
Billy, I wasn't trying to pick on your car or the way you want to race. Your car belongs in Stock just as much as mine. I was trying to make a point that a combo doesn't have to be running 1.20 under to have a favorable HP rating. There are SIXTY plus pages of non-stock parts that NHRA has now allowed. I had nothing to do with any of them. And by the way both my heads and intake on my car have GM part numbers. Yes, I get because GM stopped making them that Edelbrock now makes them for GM. These are not the only parts that the car manufactures have outsourced. I have had nothing to do with how Stock has evolved from the sixties till now. I don't agree with all of the changes, but I would rather race the Stock we currently have now compared to what we had in the 60's and 70's. BP Last edited by B Parker; 12-25-2021 at 08:01 PM. |
|
Liked |
12-25-2021, 01:53 PM | #67 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,669
Likes: 1,731
Liked 1,749 Times in 424 Posts
|
Re: New AHFS
My suggestion to all is to reach out to the NHRA with your thoughts. There are other changes being discussed.
As a side note, the change in the mineshaft rule was proposed by our representatives....
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
12-25-2021, 05:00 PM | #68 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 637
Likes: 538
Liked 905 Times in 205 Posts
|
Re: New AHFS
Gump, I have the utmost respect for you, and I think Lonnie is the best
thing to happen to NHRA in a long time, I am hearing a familiar theme. That theme is that the Stock/Super Stock council asked for the change. In the past, when we have asked our division reps if this was factual, we have been told that "No, we did not put that request forward." I am not suggesting that this happened in regard to the AHFS change, but I think it is incumbent on us to check on this with our respective reps, and establish a system with each Division, where we are sent a copy of the requests that are being put forward, so we can discuss the ramifications of these changes, and then vote on them. That way we will not be blind sided by a surprise change. In a perfect transparent world, we should find the year end rule changes boring, as we would be more up to speed as to what ALL division reps are asking for, and which ones WE had agreed to. J.R. |
Liked |
12-25-2021, 05:59 PM | #69 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Donaldsonville, LA
Posts: 969
Likes: 8
Liked 184 Times in 63 Posts
|
Re: New AHFS
I agree about Lonnie. He is probably one of few people in charge that I feel like he would actually listen to what you have to say and take consideration in whatever matter it may be. I’m really unsure as to why our representatives would suggest that. I feel like a majority of input from people who are active racers would be better. How about polls that could also be considered with other factors?
__________________
Jimmy "Cooter" Hidalgo, Jr. 4865 E/SA '04 GTO 4865 SS/GA '99 Firebird |
Liked |
12-25-2021, 07:49 PM | #70 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 836
Likes: 928
Liked 2,325 Times in 456 Posts
|
Re: New AHFS
Quote:
|
|
|
|