HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-2014, 12:06 AM   #1
pbp1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 80
Likes: 12
Liked 27 Times in 6 Posts
Unhappy Re: EFI, Alpha-N vs Speed Density fueling Strategies

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
These three sentences speak volumes.

I can have a new combination running well in Alpha-N within 3-4 dyno pulls. I have also found that it is pretty easy to dial a car from my log book once I have a couple of runs on it. I also don't have to worry about sudden changes in performance due to too much fuel correction.
You completely mis-read my statements, Speed Density does not make "sudden changes", unless the air suddenly changes, in which case you need corresponding changes in the fueling. This is a perfect example of the mis-information I hear over and over. What I have found when I discuss this with different racers and tuners is that if someone doesn't fully understand how speed density works, they don't trust it to calculate the changes in air density. The interesting thing is that it is using the exact same data that your weather station uses to predict performance.
pbp1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2014, 10:20 AM   #2
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
Default Re: EFI, Alpha-N vs Speed Density fueling Strategies

Take it easy. I am pretty sure that I don't have a learning disorder!

FYI. I am currently running two COPOs. One is running in Alpha-N. The other is running in speed density and closed loop. I believe that both tunes are pretty good. Both cars are extremely consistent. In the past I have had Stock computers, Accell Gen 6 and Gen 7, FAST, and Holley. I have always done my own tuning. I currently run the Holley HP system and find that it is far superior to anything that I have worked with in the past.

The reason for my previous comments was to make the point that Alpha-N with the corrections turned off is an extremely quick way to get a very consistent tune that will show good results.

The bottom line is that if you are going to run speed density, you need to know what you are doing. It takes much longer to define the cells to optimize the tune in all conditions. You corrections need to be spot on or the car will do dumb stuff. We are talking Stock Eliminator here. The MOV is normally very tight.

If it helps any, I drive Robin Lawrence at Holley nuts too!
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2014, 02:22 PM   #3
pbp1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 80
Likes: 12
Liked 27 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: EFI, Alpha-N vs Speed Density fueling Strategies

No worries, but now I understand why we are not on the same page. All of my information relates to VE based speed density only, not fuel flow based speed density (which is not speed density at all). As far as dialing in quickly, I think it is just a matter of what you are familiar with. I can dial in a speed density setup in 4-5 pulls, or 3-4 passes down track!
pbp1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 07-21-2014, 05:21 PM   #4
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
Default Re: EFI, Alpha-N vs Speed Density fueling Strategies

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbp1 View Post
No worries, but now I understand why we are not on the same page. All of my information relates to VE based speed density only, not fuel flow based speed density (which is not speed density at all). As far as dialing in quickly, I think it is just a matter of what you are familiar with. I can dial in a speed density setup in 4-5 pulls, or 3-4 passes down track!
Cool.
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 06:54 AM   #5
Bobby Fazio
VIP Member
 
Bobby Fazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1,458
Liked 4,379 Times in 502 Posts
Default Re: EFI, Alpha-N vs Speed Density fueling Strategies

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbp1 View Post
No worries, but now I understand why we are not on the same page. All of my information relates to VE based speed density only, not fuel flow based speed density (which is not speed density at all). As far as dialing in quickly, I think it is just a matter of what you are familiar with. I can dial in a speed density setup in 4-5 pulls, or 3-4 passes down track!
I almost forgot, how about when you are on the two-step from an external ignition box? Do the TPS and map sensor think the engine is under load and start flooding the cylinders?
__________________
'65 Mustang SS/L & L/SA
DriverInterviews.com | App.DragInsights.com

Last edited by Bobby Fazio; 07-22-2014 at 12:09 PM.
Bobby Fazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2019, 01:50 AM   #6
Rick Schillereff
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: EFI, Alpha-N vs Speed Density fueling Strategies

Ed I bracket race an 01 ls1 camaro and how and where are you putting the ITS sensor in the intake manifold. Thanks just trying to get better.
Rick Schillereff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2019, 11:22 AM   #7
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: EFI, Alpha-N vs Speed Density fueling Strategies

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Schillereff View Post
Ed I bracket race an 01 ls1 camaro and how and where are you putting the ITS sensor in the intake manifold. Thanks just trying to get better.
If I am the Ed you are talking to, I had a bung made & welded into the back of the plenum of my sheet metal Hogan Intake. Screwed the IAT sensor into that bung.
The older "TPI" cars used a threaded IAT sensor, screwed into the Intake. I just bought an IAT sensor for a '90 Vette.
I just remembered this:
I originally put my air temp sensor in the tray I had in front of my throttle body (no longer used)
And was seeing large temp variations from the water box to third gear. Looked too large to me.
Moving that sensor to the rear of my manifold took much of those large changes away. Also made my air/fuel ratio more stable during a pass, and made my car more consistent, easier to dial.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA

Last edited by Ed Wright; 06-29-2019 at 06:30 PM.
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.