|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 80
Likes: 12
Liked 27 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
|
![]()
Take it easy. I am pretty sure that I don't have a learning disorder!
FYI. I am currently running two COPOs. One is running in Alpha-N. The other is running in speed density and closed loop. I believe that both tunes are pretty good. Both cars are extremely consistent. In the past I have had Stock computers, Accell Gen 6 and Gen 7, FAST, and Holley. I have always done my own tuning. I currently run the Holley HP system and find that it is far superior to anything that I have worked with in the past. The reason for my previous comments was to make the point that Alpha-N with the corrections turned off is an extremely quick way to get a very consistent tune that will show good results. The bottom line is that if you are going to run speed density, you need to know what you are doing. It takes much longer to define the cells to optimize the tune in all conditions. You corrections need to be spot on or the car will do dumb stuff. We are talking Stock Eliminator here. The MOV is normally very tight. If it helps any, I drive Robin Lawrence at Holley nuts too! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 80
Likes: 12
Liked 27 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
No worries, but now I understand why we are not on the same page. All of my information relates to VE based speed density only, not fuel flow based speed density (which is not speed density at all). As far as dialing in quickly, I think it is just a matter of what you are familiar with. I can dial in a speed density setup in 4-5 pulls, or 3-4 passes down track!
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1,458
Liked 4,379 Times in 502 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Bobby Fazio; 07-22-2014 at 12:09 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Ed I bracket race an 01 ls1 camaro and how and where are you putting the ITS sensor in the intake manifold. Thanks just trying to get better.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The older "TPI" cars used a threaded IAT sensor, screwed into the Intake. I just bought an IAT sensor for a '90 Vette. I just remembered this: I originally put my air temp sensor in the tray I had in front of my throttle body (no longer used) And was seeing large temp variations from the water box to third gear. Looked too large to me. Moving that sensor to the rear of my manifold took much of those large changes away. Also made my air/fuel ratio more stable during a pass, and made my car more consistent, easier to dial.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA Last edited by Ed Wright; 06-29-2019 at 06:30 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|