|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 132
Liked 372 Times in 130 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Uh, Bill, My post number 9 was a joke. That's why it has " lol " after the joke. I personnally am looking at the 1978 Granada combo because it looks alot better now. If Mr. Summers can go 1.6xx under with the older hp ratings, I think the new "139 hp" should work just fine, ![]() ![]()
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 131
Likes: 25
Liked 43 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
So what are these facts you speak of??? I would like to have my horsepower reduced to the OEM number based on the fact it's never hit a trigger and nhra high balled it at 195...pre 2005 Every adjustment since then has been a reduction...
__________________
Sam Capizzi Jr. 1301 SS/AS 93 Dodge Daytona R/SA 73 Dodge Dart |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lewistown, Montana
Posts: 550
Likes: 78
Liked 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Now I am very intrigued as to when these HP get changed back, if ever?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|