HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2013, 12:58 PM   #1
Sam Capizzi Jr
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 131
Likes: 25
Liked 43 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: Ok?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stocker 2 View Post
When is the Classguide going to be changed back? It still shows the horsepowers as of 8/6/13. How can we be sure what the old horsepowers were without NHRAracer.com changing the data back?
Sure seems like that reconsideration bulletin was a smoke screen...
__________________
Sam Capizzi Jr. 1301
SS/AS 93 Dodge Daytona
R/SA 73 Dodge Dart
Sam Capizzi Jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 01:08 PM   #2
Mike Carr
VIP Member
 
Mike Carr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Enon Valley PA
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 234
Liked 83 Times in 37 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Mike Carr Send a message via MSN to Mike Carr Send a message via Yahoo to Mike Carr
Default Re: Ok?

After one session:

1 3499 U/S Gary Summers, Franklin KY, '78 Mustang 13.255 14.65 -1.395

The second run, he just ran 13.00, at only 89 mph (-1.64 and change).
__________________
Mike Carr, Tri-State S/SS Association President
Looking for 2015 S/SS Race Sponsors Contact me if interested
buffdaddy_1302@hotmail.com (724) 510-5912
Mike Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 02:21 PM   #3
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: Ok?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Carr View Post
After one session:

1 3499 U/S Gary Summers, Franklin KY, '78 Mustang 13.255 14.65 -1.395

The second run, he just ran 13.00, at only 89 mph (-1.64 and change).
WOW.............!!! 12.74???
Should be in the Q/SA class

Is Allan Macklins a 86 Turbo T'Bird?
WOW ....that is fast...

D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 02:37 PM   #4
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 132
Liked 372 Times in 130 Posts
Default Re: Ok?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Fahey View Post
WOW.............!!! 12.74???
Should be in the Q/SA class

Is Allan Macklins a 86 Turbo T'Bird?
WOW ....that is fast...

D
Dan:
Yes, I bought Marty Buth's ol' 1986 Turbo Coupe four cylinder car.
Real happy with the purchase too....set all of the Q/SA records that day in May with it in my first NHRA event.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2013, 02:35 PM   #5
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 132
Liked 372 Times in 130 Posts
Default Re: Ok?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Carr View Post
After one session:

1 3499 U/S Gary Summers, Franklin KY, '78 Mustang 13.255 14.65 -1.395

The second run, he just ran 13.00, at only 89 mph (-1.64 and change).

Yep....Mr. Summers is 1.6xx under....again.

Of course NHRA "gifted" him 23 h.p. ( on Aug 6th) .
Was 162 and now 139 hp.

Good for him.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 02:18 PM   #6
DYER
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 101
Likes: 236
Liked 195 Times in 52 Posts
Default Re: Ok?

I would like to make a few statements to the internet cry babies had to say about the ford hp on the the 302 two barrel engines I don't know anything about the gm changes so all my comments are about the fords and mainly in ss/s tirm. I am the person that bugged pat c. and give facts to make a change . based on nhra and there ahfs system .so here we go #1.mr silverman ; yes they did go back to factory ratings but isn't that where all cars are to start off ie cobra jet drag pack copo and than the ahfs system goes to work. and mr wongs truck to. have you seen any 302 2barrell fords in ss/s running to justify and hp changes ??? #2. mr wong ; iknow you are a true racer and surprise you get caught up in this internet b.s. you may be right has far as summers being soft " but wasn't your truck soft" to start with ??? and than data started to come in and hp was change on runs and data ???right !! #3 mr ness ;yes gary run under in stock trim at a national open so did not and still hasn't gone into any real data to make a change in the ahfs system .#4 mr capizzi; it was the nhra and pat c. who did the right thing after listening to FACTS that there was no data to justify hp on these combos problem so where over the years somebody gave all fords in that year range the same hp pulled out of the air with no data to justify change from factory hp #5 mr denbreeden; yesyour car could be a player with the changes and I sure other ford people out there would have thought of going racing and be coming reg. nhra customers but your right without the changes leave it home in the garage #6 mr.stock 726; as far as pat c. he did the right thing with the FACTS got he was given !!! #7 mr almack so what !! 1.999 under then wont the ahfs system go to work on tues ?? besides I don't think you or I are will trying for # 1 at indy . #8 mr wong ; 2.00 under in stock might be a little bit of a hill to climb with a ford but I would like to see you build a ss/s ford 2barrell combo in those year ranges got could 1 second under !!! . I think that covers everybody that had a comment on ford hp . after what happen here everbody should be up set overinternet cry babbies controlling nhra people and polices rather than real data from real race cars not following there own rules ie afhs system and if anybody out there has real data give it nhra but I don't anybody can find data to justify 210 hp in ss/s thanks bill dyer ss/n 85 mustang and yes I can run a second + under I am not bench racing here !!!!!!!!!!!!!
DYER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 02:51 PM   #7
Paul Wong
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 384
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
Default Re: Ok?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DYER View Post
I would like to make a few statements to the internet cry babies had to say about the ford hp on the the 302 two barrel engines I don't know anything about the gm changes so all my comments are about the fords and mainly in ss/s tirm. I am the person that bugged pat c. and give facts to make a change . based on nhra and there ahfs system .so here we go #1.mr silverman ; yes they did go back to factory ratings but isn't that where all cars are to start off ie cobra jet drag pack copo and than the ahfs system goes to work. and mr wongs truck to. have you seen any 302 2barrell fords in ss/s running to justify and hp changes ??? #2. mr wong ; iknow you are a true racer and surprise you get caught up in this internet b.s. you may be right has far as summers being soft " but wasn't your truck soft" to start with ??? and than data started to come in and hp was change on runs and data ???right !! #3 mr ness ;yes gary run under in stock trim at a national open so did not and still hasn't gone into any real data to make a change in the ahfs system .#4 mr capizzi; it was the nhra and pat c. who did the right thing after listening to FACTS that there was no data to justify hp on these combos problem so where over the years somebody gave all fords in that year range the same hp pulled out of the air with no data to justify change from factory hp #5 mr denbreeden; yesyour car could be a player with the changes and I sure other ford people out there would have thought of going racing and be coming reg. nhra customers but your right without the changes leave it home in the garage #6 mr.stock 726; as far as pat c. he did the right thing with the FACTS got he was given !!! #7 mr almack so what !! 1.999 under then wont the ahfs system go to work on tues ?? besides I don't think you or I are will trying for # 1 at indy . #8 mr wong ; 2.00 under in stock might be a little bit of a hill to climb with a ford but I would like to see you build a ss/s ford 2barrell combo in those year ranges got could 1 second under !!! . I think that covers everybody that had a comment on ford hp . after what happen here everbody should be up set overinternet cry babbies controlling nhra people and polices rather than real data from real race cars not following there own rules ie afhs system and if anybody out there has real data give it nhra but I don't anybody can find data to justify 210 hp in ss/s thanks bill dyer ss/n 85 mustang and yes I can run a second + under I am not bench racing here !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bill, I am not stating the truck isnt soft or some of my other combos are not good. Gary Summers is great guy and picked a good combination. The issue I have is we have a system that is in place and needs to be used. If we use this new standard of adjusting things back to fix net / gross horsepower adjustments made almost 40 years ago and circumvent the system already in place, we will have to adjust everything. If that be the case then there are some real good combos I will be using with the "horespower correction system".
Paul Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 02:55 PM   #8
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
Default Re: Ok?

Mr. Dyer, I'll try and make this as short and sweet as I can. We have, in effect an AHFS. The AHFS is the rule of law in Stock and SS, like it or not. It is NOT up to Pat, you, me or any other single person to take it upon themselves to right any wrongs that were done 40 odd years ago. It may be a FACT that the 302 Fords were given too much HP and you can build one and ask for a review. The AHFS doesn't consider 40 year old mistakes. Under your reasoning, My 72/307 Chevy is a mistake, the 71-75 2V/350 Chevys are a mistake, my 301 Pontiacs are a mistake ETC.. I could go on all day! The only thing around here that is right is my inline 1V 6 cylinder stuff and IT would be rated 11 HP MORE than some of your wronged 302s.
To you, Pat and anybody else in a position of power in the NHRA, please, PLEASE, before you go doing something off-the-cuff, think about the precedences that you might be setting and the people who you will affect!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 03:29 PM   #9
Sam Capizzi Jr
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 131
Likes: 25
Liked 43 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: Ok?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DYER View Post
I would like to make a few statements to the internet cry babies had to say about the ford hp on the the 302 two barrel engines I don't know anything about the gm changes so all my comments are about the fords and mainly in ss/s tirm. I am the person that bugged pat c. and give facts to make a change . based on nhra and there ahfs system .so here we go #1.mr silverman ; yes they did go back to factory ratings but isn't that where all cars are to start off ie cobra jet drag pack copo and than the ahfs system goes to work. and mr wongs truck to. have you seen any 302 2barrell fords in ss/s running to justify and hp changes ??? #2. mr wong ; iknow you are a true racer and surprise you get caught up in this internet b.s. you may be right has far as summers being soft " but wasn't your truck soft" to start with ??? and than data started to come in and hp was change on runs and data ???right !! #3 mr ness ;yes gary run under in stock trim at a national open so did not and still hasn't gone into any real data to make a change in the ahfs system .#4 mr capizzi; it was the nhra and pat c. who did the right thing after listening to FACTS that there was no data to justify hp on these combos problem so where over the years somebody gave all fords in that year range the same hp pulled out of the air with no data to justify change from factory hp #5 mr denbreeden; yesyour car could be a player with the changes and I sure other ford people out there would have thought of going racing and be coming reg. nhra customers but your right without the changes leave it home in the garage #6 mr.stock 726; as far as pat c. he did the right thing with the FACTS got he was given !!! #7 mr almack so what !! 1.999 under then wont the ahfs system go to work on tues ?? besides I don't think you or I are will trying for # 1 at indy . #8 mr wong ; 2.00 under in stock might be a little bit of a hill to climb with a ford but I would like to see you build a ss/s ford 2barrell combo in those year ranges got could 1 second under !!! . I think that covers everybody that had a comment on ford hp . after what happen here everbody should be up set overinternet cry babbies controlling nhra people and polices rather than real data from real race cars not following there own rules ie afhs system and if anybody out there has real data give it nhra but I don't anybody can find data to justify 210 hp in ss/s thanks bill dyer ss/n 85 mustang and yes I can run a second + under I am not bench racing here !!!!!!!!!!!!!

I was just asking a question. So what justifies the 185 rating on post 73 2bbl 318 mopars. If the facts are the same for a ford mopar or Chevy then it should be reduced to the oem 150. Hasn't been hit in 15 years
__________________
Sam Capizzi Jr. 1301
SS/AS 93 Dodge Daytona
R/SA 73 Dodge Dart
Sam Capizzi Jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 03:51 PM   #10
Tony Janes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Ok?

Sam that would make you a heavy U/SA. How long would it take you to get horsepower?
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS
Tony Janes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.