|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 1,731
Liked 1,749 Times in 424 Posts
|
![]()
So, who's going to test the new system first?
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Indiana (close to Louisville, KY)
Posts: 762
Likes: 494
Liked 225 Times in 104 Posts
|
![]()
You do it. I'll watch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 1,731
Liked 1,749 Times in 424 Posts
|
![]()
It looks like we will never see "mineshaft" again. Obviously, this is a drastic change. I can't see where it doesn't penalize hard work.
Someone from the NHRA needs to explain how this won't have the opposite effect on the data base. These are performance based classes, where's the incentive to go fast? Lonnie?? South Georgia will be interesting.....
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 Last edited by GUMP; 12-22-2021 at 08:32 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1,095
Liked 1,225 Times in 250 Posts
|
![]()
There are different ways to make changes, positive ways that reward people with incentive and then there are the NHRA ways. I could see this as part of a solution in concert with more rewards for performance, but NHRA execs chose only the punitive side. Unfortunately, it appears that the bean counters still rule NHRA. No racer input needed.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 1,197
Liked 1,958 Times in 493 Posts
|
![]()
"Data collected through the NHRA Live timing data base (including 660 foot elapsed time and 1000 foot elapsed time comparisons) will be utilized to verify if adjustments are needed".
__________________
Todd Greene |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 693
Liked 1,458 Times in 544 Posts
|
![]()
Since the inception of the Stock and Super Stock classes, the classes have been always considered a performance class. I believe that in the old Farmer and subsequent days, although not perfect, the adjustment system was fair.
How about heads-up runs? The current rule does not exempt heads-ups runs. The only exception is as follows: "No runs made during exempt events, National Opens, test and tune, time trials, 1/8th mile events or races within a race (i.e. Jegs Allstar eliminations, Stock / Super Stock Combos or other races that are not part of a season long points championship) are included in any review." My hope is that this new rule does not create a hazard due to top end accidents when fast guys slam on their brakes trying to slow down their cars! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 1,731
Liked 1,749 Times in 424 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Whoever wrote these changes obviously didn't do their homework!
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Plainville, IN
Posts: 519
Likes: 161
Liked 84 Times in 36 Posts
|
![]()
NMCA is the place to be, granted it doesn’t help the racers out west.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Massapequa Park,NY
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 1,746
Liked 825 Times in 267 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
1989 Camaro Iroc-Z I/SA B&B Auto Machine Shop. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|