|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 654
Likes: 675
Liked 180 Times in 55 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Bill, Bill, Bill, you cry about Ford having a bogus factor and in your defense use a bogus combination for an example? You gotta do better than that. (Insert smiley face here) Besides, a Hemi with one carb is just like a stripper with one boob. Looks kinda the same, sounds kinda the same, but just can't get the job done. (Insert more smiley faces here) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
The other 30 or so CJ's will no doubt be "Collector" cars and the owners(whores) will try to hold onto them until they can get 3 to 4 times the money they paid for them. LOL on the the single carb Hemi quote.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Somebody said, "Besides, a Hemi with one carb is just like a stripper with one boob. Looks kinda the same, sounds kinda the same, but just can't get the job done."
Phoenix #1 qualifier: 1 54 A/SA Stephen Hagberg, Berthoud CO, '64 Savoy 10.169 11.30 -1.131 Not bad for a "can't get the job done" combination.... lol! (Insert more smiley faces here) Now, where is that boob??? Oh yeah; Chicago! lol!
__________________
Bill Last edited by bill dedman; 02-20-2009 at 10:31 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hasbrouck Heights NJ, Naples Florida
Posts: 299
Likes: 4
Liked 232 Times in 44 Posts
|
![]()
His schedule is correct, He,s at the Keystone Show in Secaucus NJ in the booth next to mine signing Autographs for Magna Flow Exsaust. I will try to get a reading on the car from him tomorrow. Thanks Joe Fasano.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Ed
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 654
Likes: 675
Liked 180 Times in 55 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Not bad for a bogus combination, huh? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Dennis said, "Not bad for a bogus combination, huh?."
and, previously.... >>>>>>>"Sour grapes is what I hear from you, sir." Dennis; those "sour grapes" seem to be proliferating.... LOL! Bill (maybe we should make some wine???)
__________________
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 654
Likes: 675
Liked 180 Times in 55 Posts
|
![]()
Bill, all I'm saying is that you defended your disdain for a "bogus factor" with a bogus combination. Am I the only one who sees the irony?
I have been following class cars for many years and am fascinated by them. I also know that sometimes you can make a lot better combination with a pen than you can a dyno. I see Stinnett already moved into AA/SA. Time will take care of everything. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Milford, MI
Posts: 147
Likes: 13
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
What bogas combination are you talking about, the Challenger or the Savoy ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Bigshow,
If you've been following class racing for as long as you say you have, I'm sure you realize that the only time a bogus combination results in a situation where other races are victimized is when the NHRA mandated "factor" allows it. If the '67 Shelby GT500s had been properly factored, they would have slipped though totally unnoticed, and people wouldn't still be talking about the "paper cars" that could run so unbelieveably far under the indexes. It's never JUST the "bogus" cars...its the factors that sometimes come along with them. NHRA strapped extra horsepower on the NASCAR Hemi before they ever got to see one run, so intent were they on making sure they didn't go out and dominate like the Shelbys did. They didn't allow it to go into battle with the horsepower than Mopar had reported it had; NHRA upped the ante (and, the weight) before anyone got a chance to see if that figure was in the ballpark. Not so, the CJ's. Ford said 425, and NHRA said, "SO BE IT!!!" They run well, these NASCAR Hemis, but I am not at all sure that they are any faster than Henson's "street Hemi" motor in Ronnie West's GTX. Nitro Joe might know... But, the contention that the NASCAR Hemi car is "bogus" has no pertinenence in the argument about the 2008 CJ's because the ~only~ real argument against the CJ's is the outrageously soft factor NHRA awarded them. That wasn't done for the NASCAR Hemi motor. Different deal, altogether. Looks like apples and oranges to me.... No irony there. My cent-and-a-half... Bill
__________________
Bill Last edited by bill dedman; 02-28-2009 at 02:50 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|