HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-20-2012, 02:40 AM   #1
Jim Wahl
Veteran Member
 
Jim Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 666
Liked 683 Times in 129 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jim Wahl Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Wahl
Talking Re: New member starting a P/SA project Fairlane this winter

I thought I owned classracer.com! Darn. Jim


.
__________________
Jim Wahl....NHRA #2239 S/SS - IHRA # 8 Stock, D2 Stock Champion (forever I guess)
2019 Baby Gators Stock Champion
2009 NHRA D2 National Open Stock Champion
1982 NHRA D2 West Palm Beach LDRS SS Runner Up
Past President, Southern Stock / Super Stock Association.
Jim Wahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 08:46 AM   #2
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
Default Re: New member starting a P/SA project Fairlane this winter

Welcome to the forum Jim.
Good luck on your project.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 10:44 AM   #3
jims5600
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 125
Likes: 47
Liked 21 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: New member starting a P/SA project Fairlane this winter

Welcome to the forum. I like the Fairlanes too. Please keep us up to date on the progress of your stocker.
Best of luck!
jims5600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 12:55 PM   #4
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: New member starting a P/SA project Fairlane this winter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Jim/ Jim , You don't need a roll bar for P/SA..
Sub frame connectors wouldn't hurt though...

Other than that , I'm not going to comment on the combination. I don't want to be a party pooper.

Merry Christmas...over and out
Thought the Fairlane was a chassis frame car?
IMHO you would do better with a 4bbl.


D
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 03:38 PM   #5
Bart Kilraine
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Carrolltown,PA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: New member starting a P/SA project Fairlane this winter

1968 Fairlanes had a 302's,Be careful on the combo for stock.
Bart Kilraine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 09:00 PM   #6
JimInNY
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: New member starting a P/SA project Fairlane this winter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart Kilraine View Post
1968 Fairlanes had a 302's,Be careful on the combo for stock.
Strange as it seems, more were made with 289s than 302s from what I found.
JimInNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 11:31 PM   #7
JimInNY
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: New member starting a P/SA project Fairlane this winter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Fahey View Post
IMHO you would do better with a 4bbl.

I'm sure I would do better with a 4v car too, cept that would mean a different engine also. the hi po 289 came with a 4v carb.

I need to get about 500 cfm out of this 2v. I think it can be done legally.
JimInNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 03:18 AM   #8
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 316
Liked 1,103 Times in 301 Posts
Default Re: New member starting a P/SA project Fairlane this winter

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimInNY View Post
I'm sure I would do better with a 4v car too, cept that would mean a different engine also. the hi po 289 came with a 4v carb.

I need to get about 500 cfm out of this 2v. I think it can be done legally.
THE 289 Hi Po was not available in anything for 1968, all the 68 289s were 2 barrels, there was a 302 4 barrel that was used only in 68, factory rated at 230 HP, not sure what NHRA has it at. As for a 390, the 66&67 390 4 barrel is allowed a better intake and carb combo that the 68 is not. The 428 CJ was also available in 68, but not really a budget combo. We actually have had 3 or 4 different 302 2 barrel early 70s Maverick/Comets, in P,Q, &R/SA up here in Div. 6. In legal trim,none were really quick, index wise. However, a 68 Fairlane/Torino is a lot heavier than a Maverick or Comet, so I doubt that you could get the car light enough for P. Also, how would you intend to "legally" make the Autolite 2 barrel flow 500 cfm? You cant legally change the throttle blade , venturi,or booster sizes. Quite an uphill battle, i`m afraid.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.