HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2012, 10:01 PM   #11
Greg Reimer 7376
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 172
Liked 705 Times in 219 Posts
Cool Re: '69 Chevelle master cylinder question

My 68 Chevelle wagon has the OEM drum brake unit. It has the stock drums all the way around, and it holds on the line pretty well. As to the way the car drives,it goes down the track very well, but without sway bars, it does get the body roll on turns.Rear suspension is OEM with Lakewood no hop bars. Edelbrock adjustable upper rear arms and boxed lowers will be added in the future. A good rear bar wouldn't hurt things,either.
Greg Reimer 7376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 07:42 AM   #12
Mike Taylor 3601
VIP Member
 
Mike Taylor 3601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 353
Liked 306 Times in 103 Posts
Default Re: '69 Chevelle master cylinder question

Dan,
If booster mounted with 4 studs you'll probaly want to move master to top holes,my 79 malibu was that way originally I installed with master in center of the four holes brakes worked OK but not great found out later that manual brake setup had master mounted on the top set of holes,increased ratio made huge difference in braking power.
MAKE sure you have pushrod retained so it can't come out,some masters have just a countersunk area for the rod to set in I usaully drill that a little deeper so there is absoulutely no way for the rod to come out and fab something so pedal can't pull rod out of master anyway.
I don't want to read in your N/D stories about the your manual brake conversion gone bad and crashing the family wagon.LOL
I like reading your stories,good luck with your project.
Most of time if rear is @ stock height or lower w/factory sway bar,body roll should'nt be bad. Mike Taylor 3601
Mike Taylor 3601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 10:35 AM   #13
Dan Fletcher
Sponsor
 
Dan Fletcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Churchville, NY
Posts: 492
Likes: 128
Liked 1,045 Times in 70 Posts
Thumbs up Re: '69 Chevelle master cylinder question

The wagon is going to be a K, L, M car with a 255. The whole premise here is that Thomas wants to race every weekend, whether its for $5 or 5 million, and a stocker seems to be more suited for that as opposed to a SS car. We both love the wagon, and after watching Jody make everyone look silly, well......

After everyone's input, both here, pm's and emails, it looks like the budget is going up and the air bags are going back to inventory. Although it looks bitchin', I don't think a 12 flat car is going to need the Alf W set up, and the BMR anti-roll looks pretty nice, so I'm planning to go that direction. Thanks Greg B. The master assembly bolted onto 4 studs as you said Mike. If Alex's deal is a bolt on unit, that sounds like me! And I'll be sure to make a positive return stop for the pedal. I really don't like Thomas all that much most of the time, but I don't want the car wrecked, lol...

The car already has approved aftermarket lower trailing arms. I don't think I need to replace the upper assembly with anything trick, thoughts?

And as for body mount bushings, they look like a lot of fun to replace. All I've been able to find are poly mounts. Does anyone know of a solid mount, or do we have to make them ourselves?

Thanks again everyone!
__________________
Dan Fletcher 1781 STK, SS, COMP, SG, SC

DAN FLETCHER TRAILER SALES


Last edited by Dan Fletcher; 01-24-2012 at 10:45 AM.
Dan Fletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 12:52 PM   #14
1320racer
VIP Member
 
1320racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
Default Re: '69 Chevelle master cylinder question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Fletcher View Post
After everyone's input, both here, pm's and emails, it looks like the budget is going up and the air bags are going back to inventory. Although it looks bitchin', I don't think a 12 flat car is going to need the Alf W set up, and the BMR anti-roll looks pretty nice, so I'm planning to go that direction. The car already has approved aftermarket lower trailing arms. I don't think I need to replace the upper assembly with anything trick, thoughts?
Dan, while I agree a 12 flat car don't need Alf's suspension, the truth is the car will work better for many reasons and no one's anti roll bar functions as well as the rear housing cause that is the anti roll bar when using Alf's setup.
1320racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 04:19 PM   #15
tj310
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dresden On. Canada
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: '69 Chevelle master cylinder question

Body mounts = hockey pucks get ones that say made in Canada ,cheap ones break.---Trevor
tj310 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 04:34 PM   #16
njk53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: '69 Chevelle master cylinder question

I think a 255 is a good pick. With the right suspension set up that car will be capable of running faster than 12.00 flat. With our wagon we don't have a lot of expensive trick stuff as far as suspension components and it hooks pretty hard and goes straight as an arrow. Very easy to drive.
__________________
Nelson Kowal
Stock 345
njk53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 07:22 PM   #17
Jeff Goss
Member
 
Jeff Goss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Burlington, WA
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: '69 Chevelle master cylinder question

Wagons are cool!

Good luck with the project, Dan!
Jeff Goss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 09:12 PM   #18
Jim Carter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 190
Likes: 10
Liked 19 Times in 3 Posts
Thumbs up Re: '69 Chevelle master cylinder question

http://www.powerhouseperformance.ca/...products_id=68
Try this web site for the parts you are looking for regarding the body roll amd solid body mounts.

JimmieC
Jim Carter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2012, 11:55 PM   #19
billy leber
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: most places
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: '69 Chevelle master cylinder question

My mommy didnt need no fancy shmancy brakes to win with that car !
__________________
Billy Leber 1150 SS, 1050 SG, 1962 STK, 185 SC
billy leber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2012, 01:58 PM   #20
Lyn Smith
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pontiac,il.
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 282
Liked 972 Times in 195 Posts
Default Re: '69 Chevelle master cylinder question

H and R Parts and Stuff makes a nice anti roll bar for the A bodies.Might not need it on a small block stocker though.You can get by by just welding a plate on the bottom of your upper control arms.You can also just use the stock rubber bushings also.
Lyn Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.