225 stock eliminator help

[Chris Barnes]

Buy Phil's Slant Six and run it as an SS/GT car...maybe get a fancy intake manifold somewhere. You could probably still run the original 7 1/4" rear end!

Chris Barnes
Wagons of Steel
Stock 6621

[Billy Nees]

Originally Posted by Chris Barnes

Buy Phil's Slant Six and run it as an SS/GT car...maybe get a fancy intake manifold somewhere. You could probably still run the original 7 1/4" rear end!

Or if he just wanted to burn through wheelbarrows full of money he could build a SS/GT car with a Hyper-Pack in it.

[art leong]

Originally Posted by Billy Nees

Or if he just wanted to burn through wheelbarrows full of money he could build a SS/GT car with a Hyper-Pack in it.

I think you have to run an 8 cylinder in the GT classes. If not you could fly with an SRT4 motor turned sideways (normal to you, sideways to me)

[Phillip marvetz]

Originally Posted by art leong

I think you have to run an 8 cylinder in the GT classes. If not you could fly with an SRT4 motor turned sideways (normal to you, sideways to me)

I like your idea Art,
What if I left it sideways (normal to you)?

[Dwight Southerland]

Originally Posted by art leong

I think you have to run an 8 cylinder in the GT classes. If not you could fly with an SRT4 motor turned sideways (normal to you, sideways to me)

Which brings up an interesting issue. Will we see more class availability to race 6 and 4 cylinder engines in the near future, since that is the majority of the engines being produced. Imagine a Ford Ecoboost 6-cylinder for IHRA CM.

[Jim B]

Originally Posted by David_Ewers

what years of dodge/plymouth used the 225 2 barrel setup?

Back in the late 60's and early 70's I remember a Carter 2bbl being a fairly common factory built 225 6 cyl combo used in New York City taxicabs.

[art leong]

Originally Posted by Phillip marvetz

I like your idea Art,
What if I left it sideways (normal to you)?

Why would you lock yourself in to absolutly no traction helpers (other than weight) A final (rear end) drive ratio under 4,0. And the biggest slick you could put on the cars would be 9 x 26.
There is a lot of negatives to a FWD car.

[X-TECH MAN]

Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland

Which brings up an interesting issue. Will we see more class availability to race 6 and 4 cylinder engines in the near future, since that is the majority of the engines being produced. Imagine a Ford Ecoboost 6-cylinder for IHRA CM.

Are you on DRUGS or did you just fall on your head when you got up this morning......LOL.

[Phillip marvetz]

Originally Posted by art leong

Why would you lock yourself in to absolutly no traction helpers (other than weight) A final (rear end) drive ratio under 4,0. And the biggest slick you could put on the cars would be 9 x 26.
There is a lot of negatives to a FWD car.

Just to be different Art, LOL. People think my old wagon sounds funny now, They wouldn't know what to think if it had a 4 cyl turbo screamin in the water box with smoke pouring off the front tires.

[Todd Boyer]

Originally Posted by David_Ewers

what years of dodge/plymouth used the 225 2 barrel setup?

I believe the 2V was '77 to last year of slant production - '87.