|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,808
Likes: 2,897
Liked 5,109 Times in 1,947 Posts
|
![]()
Needs about 410 to run a second under in I/SA.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Jim get a hold of Tony Hernandez tony 5022 . Tony raced his corvette @ 250, 300, 365 hp. Jim Lewis would know hp.
__________________
Tom Moock 5704 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 372 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]()
Ok
So we know a 294 CUIN 283 4 jet can make 373 STP HP. 1.27 HP per inch. Now looking at the 300 HP 327 combination @ 340 CUIN. Bigger bore, more compression, 1.940 intake valve, more cross section in the intake port. It makes sense to me this engine should be able to make 1.27 HP per inch if not more. 1.27 X 340 = 432 HP. NHRA 365 HP 327 makes 470 HP. Last edited by HP HUNTER; 02-13-2020 at 10:58 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,808
Likes: 2,897
Liked 5,109 Times in 1,947 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
327 /365 has too much difference to base a comparison off of . http://www.classracerinfo.com/Engine...MAKE=Chevrolet I don't know how far under you want to go , Jim, but I'm standing by my observation, using my formula that has been pretty accurate over the years.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,959
Likes: 2,548
Liked 2,626 Times in 950 Posts
|
![]()
Mark,
Please speak more about your formula. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pukwana SD
Posts: 860
Likes: 554
Liked 99 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Jim Hanig; 02-11-2020 at 08:12 PM. Reason: spell |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,808
Likes: 2,897
Liked 5,109 Times in 1,947 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Anyway , the AFB deal should fall between the 4 GC and the Q-jet. We know that much . Other than that, I'd have to look at one closely, with the newer rules, and I just haven't. As mentioned , Jim Lewis would know the deal on them. I don't bother people at work, that do this stuff for a living, though. I haven't seen the ol' boy at the races in a while.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lower Dakota territory
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 1,074
Liked 799 Times in 236 Posts
|
![]()
Jim, we know what good 327-275's make so what we're looking at is....
-the difference between a good AFB and a good QJet -what (if any) difference there is in the cam (.399/.399 on the 300 & .390/.410 on the 275) -what (if any) difference there is in a good AFB intake compared to a good Qjet intake The 327/300 @ 265 isn't horrible. But the 327/250 is the same engine (except for the 4G) and intake and it's @ 245. I don't see the AFB covering the 20 hp difference, even with the intake being a bit better on the AFB.....given the current state of Stocker intake technology. But .60-.70 under should be no problem for a decent 327/300, though. -Al
__________________
"That'll never work....." |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,808
Likes: 2,897
Liked 5,109 Times in 1,947 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Derby City, USA
Posts: 3,631
Likes: 1,081
Liked 7,904 Times in 1,513 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|