HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2017, 09:17 AM   #1
Jeff Jewell
Member
 
Jeff Jewell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bangor, PA
Posts: 182
Likes: 41
Liked 171 Times in 36 Posts
Default Re: ET Differences Between Varying Powerglide Low Gear Ratio

A bunch of years back when I was messing with our A/SA '67 Corvette, I had a glide with a 1.98 low. 1.94 - 1.98 always seemed to be the sweet spot. I broke the planetary at a division race and the only spare I had handy was a 1.82 geared bracket glide. Car left like a turd and lost .04 in 60', but only slowed .02 in ET. Most if not all of the .02 was the bracket trans didn't have the lightweight parts and all the other tricks. While all that gear helps the leave, doesn't really make much of a difference in overall ET.

Your mileage may vary...
Jeff Jewell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2017, 09:46 AM   #2
Crew Chief
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: ET Differences Between Varying Powerglide Low Gear Ratio

Using a gear ratio - RPM - MPH calculator you can figure out what RPM the engine drops to when the transmission shifts to high gear. If the RPM is below the stall of the convertor, there will be slippage until the RPM reaches the stall speed. Plug in different 1st gear ratios to figure it out.

http://www.wallaceracing.com/gear-speed.php
Crew Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 09:05 AM   #3
Angelo DiTocco
Senior Member
 
Angelo DiTocco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 750
Likes: 175
Liked 189 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: ET Differences Between Varying Powerglide Low Gear Ratio

I agree with Jeff especially with the HP you're making. A 1.82 should be more than enough.
__________________
Angelo DiTocco
'98 Firebird SS/HA
'98 Firebird B/SA
Angelo DiTocco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 11:43 AM   #4
2021STK
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 281
Likes: 280
Liked 17 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: ET Differences Between Varying Powerglide Low Gear Ratio

Looks to me in that calculator the trans and rear gear data inputs are reversed. Should be: tire diameter, rear gear, trans 1st, trans 2nd, trans 3rd
__________________
Dave Outten
2222 S/SS/SST/SG/HR
2021 S 1968 SS 1969 SR 1966 1990 Bracket
2021STK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 08:42 PM   #5
jimmyparker
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: columbus, georgia
Posts: 385
Likes: 66
Liked 309 Times in 88 Posts
Default Re: ET Differences Between Varying Powerglide Low Gear Ratio

If the same converter is used in low gear comparisons the results may be slightly off. A 1.76 low gear will work the converter harder leaving than a 2.18, the 2.18 will work the converter a lot harder on the high gear shift. At one time I bracket raced an A/SA some, when on slick tracks I would leave in 2nd gear and always saw more quite a bit more flash.
jimmyparker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.