|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 58
Liked 510 Times in 117 Posts
|
![]()
I use the GM fork 3892632 not the Corvette style. Not sure if that makes a difference or not.
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 1,298
Liked 1,440 Times in 301 Posts
|
![]()
The throwoutbearing has spacers that you may have to take out To make it short enough. With a .380 disc it is pretty tight in there. Is it also shimmed between the flywheel and pp? You might have to put the QT spacer between the bell and block saver. I think the part number is rm-198. It is .250 thick. You would have to run a long pivot ball and check your crossmember and driveshaft fitment, but it opens up a lot more room for you.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: the Brazos Valley of TX
Posts: 114
Likes: 161
Liked 125 Times in 33 Posts
|
![]()
Like Ed, I went with the Browell fork and heim pivot. Best thing since sliced bread. Browell also has a variety of throwout bearing collar lengths available that might help.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 323
Liked 1,112 Times in 304 Posts
|
![]()
I didn`t know that GM racers were also having issues with QT bellhousings too. For whatever reason, it seems that Quick Time assumed that everybody that needs a scattershield is using a diaphragm style pressure plate. When they first came out, I wanted to buy a QT for my 428 FE Ford, but between them saying that their bellhousings "met all SFI test standards", yet were not provided with a SFI sticker, and that to use a QT in a Ford application and a Long style pressure plate, like a McLeod Soft Lok, or how every Ford FE powered vehicle to roll off the assembly line came equipped, required stacking 2 or 3 block plates to get adequate room,well screw that BS. I have also heard that in several applications, QT also elected to change the location and angle that the clutch fork is oriented . Too bad, had QT made a product that actually worked in a real race enviroment, they likely would have sold a lot more units. Its weight savings and compact design would have been a real plus, But to get an actual SFI stickered housing costs more, is heavier, negates much of the benefit. Sad thing that since Lakewood bought out Quick Time, that many of the old Lakewood housings have been discontinued, and now many less popular engines have no reasonably priced SFI bellhousings available any more.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 686
Likes: 84
Liked 805 Times in 245 Posts
|
![]()
I do like the lower weight, more compact size and better dimensional qualities of the Quicktime. What I didn't like was the fact that they about doubled in price after they got bought out.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Moncton, N.B.
Posts: 276
Likes: 24
Liked 24 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
Ed. How is the Browell set up working for you?
I purchased the Browell bell and clutch-fork set up but haven't see it yet; it's at Bub's so he can zero it in to my block. Terry K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 1,298
Liked 1,440 Times in 301 Posts
|
![]()
I have a QT in our Nova and have run soft loc, advanced single 10 inch, dual 7 inch and a dual 6.6 Boninfante. They are nice bellhousings. They do make a ton of different models. The only challenge I ever had was that it was about .200 shallower than the older style Lakewood or McLeod bells. When I used the clutch that was spaced off the flywheel and had a thicker disc, I ran the rm-198 spacer and it took care of it all. I also have a steel Browell with the heim joint and billet fork. They are pretty close to the same. The difference I saw is that it was about .100 deeper and the heim joint deal was nice. I had to cut the helm shorter to work with one clutch. It looks like the Browell is scalloped out near the pivot ball mount. The Browell was about 3 lbs heavier than the QT. I have not really bought any new QT stuff since they got bought out by Lakewood.
One thing I noticed, is that jerry Bickel sells a chrome moly foot that you could bolt to the inside if any bell to convert to a billet fork. I bought one, but I haven't switched over yet. I do like the billet fork. Main reason is for the use of a throwout bearing that stays in position when installing the trans. Of course the billet fork, is almost 300 and the bearing will be at least 80 bucks. They all work. If I had a good QT, I wouldn't change brands just to change brands. In the Superstock car, we now have a 7.5 deep alum bell with a window and it is awesome! Again, it goes way up in price. I think if you were really loaded, you could do an alum for a 142 tooth flywheel and it would fit in a stock tunnel. $$$.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|