Mopar 273-4bbl Combo

[Coleydog]

Originally Posted by SSDiv6

The LD4B Edelbrock intake was approved as a replacement for the 273 due to the fact it was available with a Chrysler part number. The same rationale used on the 440 Chrysler 6-Pack engine with the Edelbrock intake. The 6-Pack intake was available in both aluminum and cast iron.

Looks like it would flow better than that boat anchor.

[Billy Nees]

Originally Posted by SSDiv6

The LD4B Edelbrock intake was approved as a replacement for the 273 due to the fact it was available with a Chrysler part number. The same rationale used on the 440 Chrysler 6-Pack engine with the Edelbrock intake. The 6-Pack intake was available in both aluminum and cast iron.

And using that rationale, the 283s and 327s should have the Z-28 intake and the AMCs should have all of the group 19 stuff back.
Come on out and race the new and improved Stock Eliminator! The same as ET-2 only more expensive and with a lower purse!

[SSDiv6]

Originally Posted by Billy Nees

And using that rationale, the 283s and 327s should have the Z-28 intake and the AMCs should have all of the group 19 stuff back.
Come on out and race the new and improved Stock Eliminator! The same as ET-2 only more expensive and with a lower purse!

There are already 283 engines running the approved 327 intake.
The AMC Group 19 intake and carburetor was removed because of your diligence with NHRA. You should have probably done the same with all the other bogus that has been running out there for many years.

[gmonde]

Originally Posted by SSDiv6

The LD4B Edelbrock intake was approved as a replacement for the 273 due to the fact it was available with a Chrysler part number. The same rationale used on the 440 Chrysler 6-Pack engine with the Edelbrock intake. The 6-Pack intake was available in both aluminum and cast iron.

the amc r4b had the amc part number as well,, am 4485729,,