HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-2016, 06:00 AM   #1
Terry Witzel
Member
 
Terry Witzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Marion,Ohio
Posts: 247
Likes: 48
Liked 50 Times in 28 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeuceCoupe View Post
Freddie has sent me several records sheets (thanks) and that is helping the effort. Trouble is, they are the cryptic "69 Chevy" style so you have to guess at model/engine. I am getting pretty good at it.


But here is one for any gurus:
June 1971
H/S Gary Moore-Carroll's Auto Service-Pierson Pontiac, Tulia, TX
114.06mph, Houma, LA May 71


So I am ASSUMING the car is a Pontiac but they don't even give the year. A 70 GTO 400/350 fits but that is a total guess.

Web search discovered nothing on the car.
Anybody recall?
Terry Witzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2016, 05:23 PM   #2
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Biebel View Post
NHRA knocked out all combinations that were never built or offered as regular production line combinations.....this included hydro equipped SD's. I think it was after the 1968 season.

'57 Chevy's could not use 4 speed transmissions anymore since they were only offered in Corvettes. 3 speed manual or P/G

'62 Plymouth same deal.....383/343 could not run a 4 speed....3 speed manual or auto...

Lot's of other combinations were disallowed.......
I thought all that was way over due. I could not understand those being legal to begin with.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2016, 09:54 PM   #3
DeuceCoupe
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

Quote:
Originally Posted by bill dedman View Post
Deuce coupe...

Here is a copy of a post I wrote back in 2007 that may help you with your article., The thread it comes from (one from December, 2007) has lots of posts from knowledgable people whose posts you might want to investigate.

This is my contribution to that thread:

"NHRA allowed the 4-speed HydraMatic in Chevy sedan deliveries and El Caminos from about 1964 until they pulled the plug on all the "Dual-Range" 4-speed HydraMatics somewhere arounf 1972 or '73....not sure of the exact dates.........

This is a link to that earlier thread: http://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=8410

Hope this helps!




Bill,
Thanks for that old Dec.2007 link:
Great history on transmissions & NHRA.
I gather from your comments:
1. Nobody drag raced a TurboGlide (or very few & not for long), fairly easy to see.
2. On the Roto / SlimJim - why was it so slow, isn't it just a simpler Super/Jetaway 2-coupling Hydramatic?
3. I had assumed folks like Lloyd & Carol Cox (61-62 Ventura/Cat) would have run the Roto, cant find that info, do you know? Or did they run the bigger-car Super Hydramatic?


Good pics of Lloyd & Carol & Cars:
http://www.dragracingonline.com/feat..._11-cox-1.html
DeuceCoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 02:12 AM   #4
bill dedman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

1. The problem with a Turboglide was, it held the engine at about 3,500 rpm until it was going about 75 mph... Only then, after it was in 3rd gear (1:1) would the rpms start increasing. A small block Chevy doesn't make much power at 3,500 rpm... so, no, not many people ran them...

2. The Slim Jim was a 3-speed automatic that suffered from having one too few gears; it acted like a 4-speed automatic that was missing second gear... the large rpm drop from 1st to second was excerbated by the fact that second was a direct (mechanical) application of engine torque (had no power going through the fluid coupling) so there was no "slip" at all,and this droppped the rpm even further.. not a good thing.

2. I don't know which transmission the Cox cars ran, but if I had to guess, I would imagine that they all ran the two-fluid-coupling, 4-speed transmission; the Slim-Jim was too fragile and slow to be effective.

Oldsmobile called that big-car transmission "Jetaway HydraMatic", while Pontiac called it "Strato-Flight HydraMatic"..... same transmission. I have never seen either referred to as a "Super HydraMatic."
Sorry I don't know more about the Cox cars... but, I seem to remember that the Cox race cars were always high-performance versions, and as such, would not have come with the Slim Jim boxes.
__________________
Bill

Last edited by bill dedman; 06-27-2016 at 02:16 AM.
bill dedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 07:49 AM   #5
jimmyparker
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: columbus, georgia
Posts: 385
Likes: 66
Liked 309 Times in 88 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

Reference the 70/71 Records, I have one little tidbit that reminds us what communication was like in the "old days". I set the O/S record at the Gainesville Div II race in '71 at around 13.45, tore down and was really happy to get the record. What I didn't know was that Bruce Wilkinson set it the same weekend in Bowling Green at 13.41 or so. I got my certificate but it never hit ND which was a big deal back then. I had a 220hp '66 Belair Two door sedan and Bruce was running his '56 wagon at that time.


Jimmy Parker
jimmyparker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 09:23 AM   #6
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 25
Liked 557 Times in 217 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

The automatic transmissions and converter or fluid coupling issues were a very big deal back then and why manuals were preferred. "Slush Box" was a popular term...I had a '58 Pontiac with an automatic trans and raced it a little. It was my Street car and I also used it as a tow car. Trans went and I had it rebuilt by a racing buddie. Shifted to hard after the rebuild. Those transmissions failed often if raced.
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 01:26 PM   #7
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyparker View Post
Reference the 70/71 Records, I have one little tidbit that reminds us what communication was like in the "old days". I set the O/S record at the Gainesville Div II race in '71 at around 13.45, tore down and was really happy to get the record. What I didn't know was that Bruce Wilkinson set it the same weekend in Bowling Green at 13.41 or so. I got my certificate but it never hit ND which was a big deal back then. I had a 220hp '66 Belair Two door sedan and Bruce was running his '56 wagon at that time.


Jimmy Parker
I had the same thing once. Set both ends of the N/S record with my '56, tore down for Red Anderson (I was just a kid, and scared to death of him.), the Ronca Bros set both ends
the same weekend in div 1. I got the points, nothing else. I set the ET record two more times. I never could run the MPH those guys ran.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.