|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 685
Likes: 84
Liked 805 Times in 245 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Jim Caughlin SS 6019 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Hans Olsson; 06-25-2016 at 03:59 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Walla Walla WA
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The relationship between E.T. and MPH is offen refered to as the "Hook factor". Normally if you're 1340 to 1355 its acceptable, if you use this factor to anaylze your performance levels, remember its just a yardstick for comparsion purposes, but not a bad one. Also works for 1/8th mile when you use approximately 670 to 680. I run my customers performance levels through this exercise to evaulate their baseline, then continue to monitor the HF as we improve the performance. High and low powered cars upset the apple cart a tad, but its still a useful tool.
Dennis Baccus - Dynamic Power, Walla Walla WA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|