|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: northern Minnesota
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I tied a set of headers together on Line's dyno and picked up five foot pounds of torque with no other changes. A two into one set up. Back to Jack Davis, he told me he made a set of two into one collectors for a NASCAR team. When they ran their car at Michigan the car was so much faster that Nascar banned the two into one set up. Hence they went to the "X" pipe. All we are trying to do is to keep fifteen pounds of atmospheric pressure from running back up the pipes. The fewer openings you have for the exhaust pulses to exit the better headers and collectors will work. Just think of how small that exhaust pulse is at six to eight thousand or more r.p.m.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
|
![]()
I'm not understanding what you're trying to say. If X cfm of air and fuel is going in then X cfm of air and fuel must be coming out. The exhaust pulse may be getting faster(and stronger) but it's not getting smaller!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
There are lots of times you can go much faster without changing anything because of the broader power curve. If you already have your cam timing advanced to the max with lobes as big as possible, then you will not see so much of a benefit bolting on a 421 header. Making more power at the top of the curve is a matter of how well built the header is from a flow viewpoint. Too many tight bends and lousy port to flange transition is where most fall down. Most of that is right at the flange. It is very important and overlooked. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lower Dakota territory
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 1,074
Liked 799 Times in 236 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks, Calvin. Initial dyno work was done with a decent set of 1 3/4 dyno headers with a good merge collector. A set of good 1 5/8-1 3/4 headers with a very good merge collector was worth 8 hp. over the 1 3/4 dyno headers. The motor was freshened up (including a different cam) and we started with the 1 5/8-1 3/4 headers for a baseline. Then we put your 4-2-1's on and with no other changes picked up 11 hp and a big bunch of torque starting at 4,400. I had expected to see the torque pick up but wasn't expecting the h.p. increase. -Al
__________________
"That'll never work....." Last edited by Alan Nyhus; 10-13-2015 at 10:12 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Going from a 4into1 to a 421 it is a safe bet. I am always willing to discuss those decisions with folks if they would like,and I do often, but the cam grinders are probably more up on direction to go there. I will say that a 421 header will almost always add bottom end power no matter what size you make it. But horsepower upstairs is very easy to lose or miss by breaking flow rules and using wrong tube size. (read; you should get what you pay for) ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If your intake lobe duration and location is compromised by needing to maintain a certain bottom end power level for the hit, than shortening your exhaust isn't gonna help much. I think I posted before, if you let the headers protect the bottom end power, (and they can) you can move the intake to places you could not before. I think it is certainly possible that the "421 needs less exhaust duration" thinking was a benefit because that also changes the effective lobe center which is what the motor really wants. Tight lobe centers as a rule help larger lobe cams to run better but at the expense of a shorter power curve.When you only have three (or two!!) gears the broader your curve the faster your gonna go, all else being equal. If you are not willing to bring the exhaust system into the equation your tuning options are expended sooner. Overall, on the issue of "should I try a merged collector?", if you have the funds, and your engine builder shrugs his shoulders, pick a header builder and start with their recommendation. Outside of that it is a crap shoot. Successful guesses probably run around 20-30%. ![]() I would also say if you have not tried simply lengthening your collector, do that first. If there is no effective change by doing that fairly cheap modification, than a merged collector probably won't either. Your header is not very close to what the engine wants and changing the collector is not gonna help. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|