|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
|
![]()
Yes . . . what some are doing.
Back in the day of modifieds, they would use the body of a Holley list 4224 660 cfm carb fitted to an 850 double pumper base plate. The carb body would be reamed from the bottom to match the 1 3/4" size of the throttle bores. Voila! The new "blended" carb would flow in the 750-775 cfm range, but keep the small venturis for crisp throttle response and high quality fuel atomization for under 300 cu in engines. I suspect the difference between a 1.686"/1.093" carb and a 1.686"/1.186" carb would not be as great as one would fear. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
|
![]()
From what brain cells that I have left, I seem to recall the 1.21 Dual-Jet flows about 290 CFM, the 1.18 2G about 320 CFM, the small-base 1.092G about 260 CFM. I've never played with a large-base 1.09 2G but I will assume(there I go ASSuming again) that because of it's larger and better shaped airhorn it would do better than a small-base 1.09.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|