|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 583
Likes: 8
Liked 54 Times in 27 Posts
|
![]()
I asked a similar question of Hoosier regarding their 30x9 bias ply slicks. Combined with my limited experience using 8" and 10" wheels with them, it seems that they grow more with the 8" wheel, and section width is about .8" less. The sidewall seems to work harder and wrinkle more with 8". I am told you can run the pressure up from 11 lb. to 13 lb. with the bigger wheel, but haven't tried it yet. Performance is similar and Hoosier confirmed that on slower cars there won't be much difference. That was confirmed by a former holder of the D/S record, who used up to13 lb.
I just bought a new pair, and got 9" wheels for them. My hope is that the sidewalls will be happy and I will get the best of the growth vs. footprint vs. section width. It is not as expensive for me to test as I use 20 lb. Marsh racing wheels (steel) for a nostalgia look/car. [I get them with centers for 5/8" studs, 45 deg. lug nuts such as ARP sells]. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
I'm going to buy a pair of Diamond Racing Spun Wheels for my circle track 13 x 8 x 20 tires I can get the backspacing I need and they are only 14 pounds each.
I wish I could use a radial tire. But I have to be happy to even have a biased ply that is 20" tall. If I go taller I kill the car at least .15 and 2 mph. Which is fine in protect mode I've tried ABA testing of 6 inch rims and 8 inch rims and the 6 inch cross the finish at least 200 rpms higher. So the narrower rim (in my case) grows a lot less. These are not ordinary slicks there is almost no sidewall (3 inches).
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS Last edited by art leong; 12-29-2012 at 07:52 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|