Ken Keir wheelie bars

[1320racer]

watch the video and again, who are you?

ran in the 9's too.

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

watch the video and again, who are you?

ran in the 9's too.

I think thats the 522 Cu in Sunset program, in the video.

[1320racer]

if you've actually "seen" the car you'd know. BTW, it's Sunset Racecraft and you're still avoiding the question...who are you?

Thinking you haven't seen my former Chevelle in person, you've only seen it on the net!

Enough of what I did 5 years ago. I've since been 1.17 with my new ride and also off the footbrake!

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

it's Sunset Racecraft and you're still avoiding the question...who are you?

Thinking you haven't seen my former car in person, you've only seen it on the net!

Its easier to draw comparisomes between the red 68 with the iron head program to a super stocker, for me atleast, than the 522. Do you have a time slip for the 9.89 pass? Very interested lower track times. Thanks in advance.

[1320racer]

still hiding? Done playing with you.

[Ed Wright]

Looks like your both hiding behind squirely made up screen names.

[1320racer]

Ed I don't hide and when you click on my user name, my profile page has my name right under the album photo...Ed Bigley. Further, anyone wanting and info about me and my former Chevelle need only contact 2 of the 3 friends listed on my profile page who know me and my car very well. Rich Biebel who built every version of my 468 that was run in that car from 1998 - 2007 and Jeff Jewel who I have raced with for the better part of the past 20 years. Back to your comment, HP Hunter knows who I am and is hiding his identity and that's the only reason he registered last night. He refuses to believe the performance of my former Chevelle.

Oh and I have the time slip, I've got them all.

[HP HUNTER]

Originally Posted by Ed Wright

Looks like your both hiding behind squirely made up screen names.

Not sure about that, new to your forum. My question here is this, and its a very legitemit question thats needs a real answer, how does a 10.07 @ 131 = a 1.28 60, that car is not moving hard enough down low to run that, as evidenced by the 131 MPH. Pump gas, you on the forum look at the exhaust, it doesnt look like pump gas to me. Now you will say I have a problem with the performance, not so, compression (11.5), roller cam, single plane, big double pumper holley, ported heads, and so on, my goodness, I would hope the car could run a 10.07 especially at Atco. The car runs 9.89 @ 134 and change, again high MPH for the ET, certainly you would have a faster 60 with the 522, show us the time slip, certainly this is a fair request, put this to bed. Looks like the picture of the exhaust will have to wait till later, it will need to be resized.