|
|
|
|
12-29-2010, 06:24 AM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: spokane, wa
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 64 nova for superstock?
GT very good point.
 the stocker way to go would be more fun and cheaper as a get your feet wet deal.  i am looking for a car to get my feet wet with not going for a .8 under car just a good fun one to get lots of seat time with. but i understand about the 2bbl vs 4bbl thing as the 2bbl has no airflow.
__________________
future superstock eliminator racer and gear banger.... 
Last edited by 283nova; 12-29-2010 at 06:29 AM. |
|
|
|
12-29-2010, 08:00 AM
|
#2 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jackson
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: 64 nova for superstock?
If you just want to play the 2bbl combo will be OK as long as you run Q (out where you live in Div 6....But when & if you want to go fast & have a good combo claim 65 & run the 327/250 combo ....fits G-H-I
__________________
Greg Fulk 308 308X P/SA "ALL AMERICAN" |
|
|
|
|
12-29-2010, 08:31 AM
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: spokane, wa
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 64 nova for superstock?
if i claimed 65 would i have to put a 65 nose on my car? also the different taillights and trunk lid?
like ive mentioned bfore guys i apprecciate the help. i might be a new comer to the class but not the sport. once i get out of school its build time. i just want to get my ducks in a row.
__________________
future superstock eliminator racer and gear banger....
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2010, 10:42 AM
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
Re: 64 nova for superstock?
It's a natural R in stock now. With the 5hp reduction, it took an additional 83 lbs off of the combo. It should be right at 1 second slower than the 4gc 220/217 combo, from what a couple of knowledgible guys have said.
Wade O |
|
|
|
|
12-29-2010, 10:49 AM
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: spokane, wa
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 64 nova for superstock?
good info, thanks wade-o
__________________
future superstock eliminator racer and gear banger....
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2010, 07:22 PM
|
#6 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lagrange,nc
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 64 nova for superstock?
64 65 and 66 Nova 2-door Looks to me like a natural P car and up or down to O ,or , Q...283/195/170. I figured a mid 16.57 weight break. Wade must have figured a Chevelle body w/17.63 wt break....
__________________
Danny Waters, Sr / 73 Duster "340" |
|
|
|
|
12-29-2010, 07:39 PM
|
#7 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: spokane, wa
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 64 nova for superstock?
so what else is in o and p car wise?
what the combo for L
__________________
future superstock eliminator racer and gear banger....
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2010, 11:55 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Live Reporter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
|
Re: 64 nova for superstock?
Quote:
__________________
Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development |
|
|
|
|
|
12-30-2010, 12:06 AM
|
#9 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: spokane, wa
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 64 nova for superstock?
i meant if i claimed 65 for regular superstock,
but in GT i know it says can run any engine as long as its the same make as the body. whic in that case, wouldnt it be better to claim 67?? then you could have a q-jet instead of the 4gc?
__________________
future superstock eliminator racer and gear banger....
|
|
|
|
|
12-30-2010, 07:50 AM
|
#10 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jackson
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: 64 nova for superstock?
No 4bbl 283 in 67
__________________
Greg Fulk 308 308X P/SA "ALL AMERICAN" Last edited by greg fulk; 12-30-2010 at 07:54 AM. |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
