|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
it was 8.90 at 155
its 8.90 at 190 now. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SW FLORIDA
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
and at VMP who's the guy with the blown dragster running 8.90 @ 200+
![]() I have to agree with Tom also.....leave it alone, it ain't broke ![]()
__________________
Rick Blake 2395 SG, SC, SP |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I voted in s/c to lower index to 8.50. my opinion is nhra is just trying to feel this out and make sure it's gathering driver's interest and i commend them for that no matter what happens.
I do think we need to keep up w/ the times. Technology in tires, engines, chassis, etc. have all contributed to cars going faster and safer. A change to the super class indexes every 20 years should at least be considered as long as technology and cost continue to support it (which i believe it will). In fact, I believe, you will occassionally get a few new racers into the super classes because of index changes. Right now a racer considering competing in the super classes w/ no data on the .90 index has to compete against racers w/ potentially years and years of data for their set up on the .90 index. To me, that's the biggest disadvantage, not mph. There's always going to be an advantage for anyone that can afford to go to more races and gather more data, as it should be. However, we all like parity in sports. A slight change to the index every 15-20 years would help level the playing field for everyone, no matter how many races they've attended, especially for anyone considering it for the first time. Even though my car would easily handle the change to 7.90 I think that would be too drastic of a change all at once. Although, I would have voted for a change to 8.00 just to make explaining the breakout rule easier to explain Happy Holidays all! Last edited by sc 5015; 12-12-2010 at 12:45 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Disputanta Va (30 minutes from VMP)
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Reply to Mr. Budman,
I tried to run a Super Street Association here in Florida and Georgia. I got on the phone to call all the Super Street & Super gas Racers that I knew and could get a hold of, told them of our rules, pay out and entry fees, they all said they would make an effort to support the new association. At our first Association race at SGMP we had 15 cars the 1st day and 9 the second day. On both days there was a bracket race for the track itself. We watched 20-25 cars that could have run with us, but decided to just bracket race. So, tell me where do, you think you are going to get the cars to run at an association race. In the south we have too much good weather, too many tracks having high dollar bracket races and all that shows up are dragster and we still couldn't get a good car count to run Super Street. I even changed the rule to no a weight limit. At a divisional race you would see cars come out of the wood work. People would go to just visit & party. So now is not the time to start association up. Now that the economy has gotten worse you won't see half as many cars as of 2 yrs ago. The stupidest rule that NHRA has is the weight, 2800lbs for Super Street. If NHRA would change that rule the car count would go up in SST. Because the slower super gas racers would have an opportunity to race SST and not worry about the weight limit. The guys who just bracket race in their light weight cars might come race with us also. We have had super gas racers in the past run Super Street and not have their way with us as they were thinking they could. They under estimated the Division 2 Super Streeter’s. hahahaha!!! That is all I have to say about that; DJMoore 238D SST |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|