HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-15-2010, 07:39 PM   #1
Bill Edgeworth
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lightweight Axles

Listen to Wade.

Lightest AND smallest diameter.
Taking two rotating parts of the same weight lets say a solid axle verses a larger diameter gun drilled axle the larger diameter part of the same weight takes more energy to accelerate to the same speed. In fact a lighter part that is significantly larger in diameter can take more energy to accelerate.

Here is some casual reading on the subject;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_of_inertia

Now when it comes to aluminum verses steel spools I think there is much more too it than rotational inertia. I think flex and friction may play a big role.

So just build your whole drive train out of titanium then we can start talking about $200,000 stockers LOL
__________________
Bill Edgeworth 6471 STK
Bill Edgeworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2010, 08:19 PM   #2
FED 387
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 529
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
Exclamation Re: Lightweight Axles

Most manufacturers specifically recommend NOT TO USE aluminum spools in cars that weigh over 2800-3000 pounds ---You MIGHT get away with an aluminum spool in a heavy (over 2800) car if it is a real LOW HP car---No hi torque hi HP applications for HEAVY CARS using aluminum spools- No trans brake/stick shift cars either--Rotating mass is where its all at---In stock/SS stock applications yer not looking for that last hundreth or thousandth like in a Comp/Pro Stock Application--that is the most likable application for aluminum spools/lightened ring gears/scalloped flange rifle drilled axles NOT stock or SS---Comp 387
FED 387 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2010, 10:25 AM   #3
Cam
Junior Member
 
Cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Prince George, BC, Canada
Posts: 83
Likes: 6
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lightweight Axles

Our car is 3200 pounds with a stick and a MW aluminum spool. We ran a best 60' this summer of 1.38. Sounds like the clock is ticking.
__________________
Cam Chowen
6067
1994 Camaro C/S
Cam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2010, 10:46 AM   #4
mopar jeff
Member
 
mopar jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lightweight Axles

Quote:
Originally Posted by FED 387 View Post
In stock/SS stock applications yer not looking for that last hundreth or thousandth
I guess I have it all wrong then.
__________________
Jeff Interlicchia
7077 D/SA 1998 Pontiac Firebird LT1
J707 E/T 1966 Dodge Coronet 500
mopar jeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2010, 10:47 AM   #5
Stick Racing
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 169
Likes: 4
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lightweight Axles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Edgeworth View Post
Listen to Wade.

Lightest AND smallest diameter.
Taking two rotating parts of the same weight lets say a solid axle verses a larger diameter gun drilled axle the larger diameter part of the same weight takes more energy to accelerate to the same speed. In fact a lighter part that is significantly larger in diameter can take more energy to accelerate.

Here is some casual reading on the subject;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_of_inertia

Now when it comes to aluminum verses steel spools I think there is much more too it than rotational inertia. I think flex and friction may play a big role.

So just build your whole drive train out of titanium then we can start talking about $200,000 stockers LOL

LOL? I was in Orlando some years ago and walked by a SS Hemi car. They were changing the center section in the rear. The axles were sitting behind the car. They were a shiny grey, unlike any axles I have ever seen. I commented to a friend about it. He walked over and picked one up. It wasn't steel.

_________________________________

Andy Stone 1102 A/S 1112 SS/C
Stick Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2010, 11:14 AM   #6
Wade_Owens
Senior Member
 
Wade_Owens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: Lightweight Axles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Edgeworth View Post

Now when it comes to aluminum verses steel spools I think there is much more too it than rotational inertia. I think flex and friction may play a big role.
Bill, you are exactly right. I have talked with a couple of Pros extensively on this topic. Its the flex that kills the Pro Stock cars. Trust me, if aluminum would live, even for just 2 passes, AND be faster, it would be in their car.

Ed, what Haas said to you is right, but, as is said here before, apples and oranges with what we do and a Pro Stock car, I'll never have to worry about the later!

As for longevity in one of our cars, when I finished my car in late '07, I put an aluminum Moser spool in. Tim Irwin told me at that time that they had previously had breakage problems, but, got it fixed. I have had the rearend apart at least 3 times a year since then. The axles are as tight as day one with no visual signs of problems. Without gears installed and dial indicator check, it still only has .001 runout. You be the judge........

Wade O

Last edited by Wade_Owens; 10-16-2010 at 11:15 AM. Reason: proof read
Wade_Owens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2010, 12:47 PM   #7
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Lightweight Axles

Wade, what will live in a foot braked 283" stocker won't necessarily live in a trans braked SS car. When I pulled that spool out it had .004" run out. Jerry Hass was with that Hemi SS car because he built it. Not only Pro Stock cars.
I have talked to others that made only the light spool & ring gear change as I did, and nobody found any gain. I'm usually between 1.29 & 1.34 in 60' with the steel spool, exactly the same with the lightened ring gear and aluminum spool.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2010, 01:00 PM   #8
Rich Aceves
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lightweight Axles

Ditto: Wade & Bill.
Rich Aceves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2010, 02:44 PM   #9
FED 387
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 529
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
Default Re: Lightweight Axles

Mopar Jeff---Most Comp cars weigh considerably less than a Stock/SS car ---pro cars all weigh 2350 min wt- MOST COMP cars weigh about 1180-1600 for a dragster and from about 2300-2900 for a door car although some are a little lighter or heavier depending on the combination/class---granted most pros have 1190-1300 hp but they are spinning the tires a bit at the hit with the power they have and they all have 40 spline set ups too--Most pros run the 9 1/2 inch Dewco gears along with the Dewco spool---Some run MW or Strange and a few use a Moser spool---The high HP Comp LIGHT WEIGHT cars all use 40 spline parts mostly Dewco some also use Strange/Moser/MW too- Those lightweight cars weigh anywhere from about 1100-2400 pounds weight wise--- no comparison to a 3500-4200 pound Stock /SS car they also use Carbon Fiber or aluminum drive shafts Again NOT recommended for HEAVY cars.--I'm not trying to convince ya on what to run just merely trying to enlighten ya on why certain types of cars utilize certain kinds of parts. If it works for YOU great but ya better be diving in that rear end every weekend or so to check for any signs that might predict failure--Those 10,00 RPM launches are brutal on drivelines--I honestly believe that the typical Stock or SS car RARELY pulls the rear or axles out to check them and if at all maybe one time a season whereas we take the driveline out after every other weekend to check !!! If alum works for ya or Titanium is legal and ya don't wanna run steel OK---If ya are happy with Steel stuff OK too----It's all in your combo what works for me may not work for you and vice versa-- Your still not looking for that coupla extra thousandths which can translate into hundreths tho like a comp or Pro car is--Comp 387
FED 387 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2010, 02:58 PM   #10
FED 387
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 529
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
Default Re: Lightweight Axles

Ed wright that 1.29-1.36 60 foot is .06 in ET which in a Comp car translates to about .12 in ET at the 1320----No Comp car is gonna give up a TENTH +++ to run a steel setup versus an aluminum/ liteweight axle set up--- never gonna happen---Comp 387
FED 387 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.