|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 654
Likes: 675
Liked 180 Times in 55 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Not hating here, but I can not understand the car not selling for $35K. The early A bodies are an odd lot with not much of a following, and the D-Darts just don't have that much history. A good early A will rarely ever go over $10K, I'd think $35K would be a gift. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Well put "bigshow296".
Without any history (Paper-trail) hard to think the owner passed up a legitimate offer of $35,000. FECARMAN may be closer to the truth, "Monopoly" money!!! If you look closely at this car, many things do not look correct. I'm no expert, but I know a little. I'll list errors later ![]() The Ellis Collection lists the car as "described as" And also states; "This particular example" And Galen Govier decoding states that the D-Dart was built at Hamtramck on April 17, 1966. But, was THIS car built their on THIS date, and is THIS car an original D-Dart? Message to the owner.. That was a generous offer $35,000. Message to the buyer...."Caveat emptor" PC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Paul,
Yes it is a true D/Dart. I'll vouch for it. Having spent many hours working on this particular car, I learned a lot about the D/Darts and how to verify ones authenticity. There are a lot of things wrong on the car. I could make a list a lot longer then yours. But I won't. I just hope they fix the blatient mistakes before it goes on the block again. At $35-$40K, I don't think they would break even on the car. With it being a 1 of 50 car, they put a lot of money into it. I'd like to see it go for $50K or more. That would make my other one a little more valuable. Alan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
I told you guys a long time ago that it was a poor restoration. Those cars are not worth anywhere near that kind of money no matter how much is invested to restore them.
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 10-04-2009 at 06:15 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 654
Likes: 675
Liked 180 Times in 55 Posts
|
![]()
The early A bodies are red-headed step-children just like '66-7 B bodies. Neat cars, but just don't attract the money and love.
I've owned and raced a '66 Valiant 2 door post car for almost 10 years and even I think they're ugly. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Alan,
Your closer to the car than anyone. So if it's an LO23D62 car, then the VIN# is proper verification. Even if some posted info states that they were an LP23 (P = Premium), instead of an LO23 (O = Super Stock) The general resto looks very good (ie; paint and interior). The problem in selling the car might be, is that a D-Dart expert (not too many out there) might want a perfect or near-perfect D-Dart. The non-experts (some collectors, out for profit only) might not be completely sure of what they are puchasing. By the looks of the car, I don't doubt that there was an exhausting effort put forth. But some of the little things could have been corrected. Remember, limited production of a vehicle means nothing. It's the consumer interest that drives the wheels. I can get my hands on a 68' 340 Cuda (virgin and unre-stored), but I'm not sure I want to go through the time and effort of restoring it, and trying to sell it to make a profit. I know what the market will bear a 68' 340, and as nice as those cars are, I can't make the move. I'll lose money, not including all of the sweat equity. Paul |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
The "collector car market" hasn't done any favors for those who just want to buy a car and race it.
The inflated prices that are collected for restored examples only serve to enrichen the restorer (and sometimes the auction company,) and make existing, un-restored cars worth more money, so, when a true hobbyist finds the car he wants to race, or just fix up into a neat street car, it ends up either being financially unattainable, or costs him a lot more than he would have paid, if it were not for "collectors" who use the hobby to make money. I remember when you could buy all the '57 Chevy 2-door hardtops you wanted for about $200.00 apiece...complete and running. There was no "collector car" market, then... Try to find one now, to turn into a Super Stocker... I think it's a shame.
__________________
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Bill,
The "Shark was Jumped" back in 2006, at Scottsdale, Arizona. The "Ray Allen" "Briggs Chevrolet", 1970 1/2" SS454 Chevelle, NHRA SS/EA record holder went for $1,200,000. The big winners, Ray Allen. And a very nice commision check to Barrett-Jackson. The losers, everyone else involved in the Musclecar genre'. Even Ray Allen was laughing at the way the (2) bidders were going out-of-control. Barrett-Jackson pushed that bid way over the boundary. Things really got out-of-control. It seems that now, the market is leveling out, and maybe soon will be back where it belongs. As for the D-Dart. Alan, what # car is that. If L023.....888 is the #1 car (Ted Spehar's) and LO23....937 in Georgia is #50. Then what # is the car being auctioned. Will $30,000 do? Paul |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|