HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-30-2008, 11:27 PM   #11
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: motorcraft 4300 carb info

The AMC 360-390-401 of 1970 thru 1972 (390 was discontinued with the introduction of the 401) used the square flange (Holley, Carter, etc., interchange) with the 1 9/16" x 1 11/16" throttle blade size as correctly mentioned by Garrett. After 1972 AMC used the spread-bore flange on the 360-401 which was also used on the FOMOCO 429-460 engines.
I've found the 4300 to be a decent carb with the exception of the bowl size and of course CFM. Although not as bad as a Q-Jet fuel bowl I suppose. I've found it is well engineered as BSFC numbers are pretty decent with just jetting changes (there are no secondary jetting or metering rods). In fact, when we started playing with air bleed sizes, minute changes +/- from stock just killed power. And the fuel bowl wasn't an issue untill I started running Superstock and that problem was also corrected. But it definetly is not of sufficient CFM for a 390 engine!
Now if only we could get those pesky 351 Boss and Clevlands to also run the factory supplied carb, we would really see who was on top of their game!
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.