Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright
Tony (Cratemotor), many of us have to wonder why anybody would build a car that could only run with one association? Why would a person not simply build one that could run with anywhere?
NHRA has so many classes, and cars (compared to IHRA) that why would anybody want to add more classes?
And our hard working tech people have to keep up with even more combinations?
I have been doing this since 1962, and have now seen both AHRA & IHRA come and go. Both had some "unusual" classes.
Logical thing to do would build a car that could run anyplace. Not expect others to make new rules to accommodate your poor choices.
You can't just make your car a legal Stocker?
|
You asked me this before like im some kind of moron. 2016 Nitro Joes shows over 50 CM cars. So i guess im not the only one who chose to back myself into a corner. In my geographical area we have (had) 2 tracks with in 3 hours driving distance that have (had) IHRA National or divisional races. So it made sence for me to build an IHRA combo. Plus, without making excuses, there is also 4 or more dirt circle track and 1 ashfalt track in a 5 hour radius so alot of the good castings have gone away with that stuff so yes it next to impossible to find heads and intakes. 330hp Crate motor uses 2 castings found on 96 and up 5.7L vortec engines and they flow real well and there is lots available. So it made sence at the time to move forward with the crate engine combo. And as for the hard working NHRA officials its maybe 10 more engines (ford, dodge and GM) that are identical to whats already there inspection wise. Your making it sound like we have some exotic stuff that is space age.