ET Differences Between Varying Powerglide Low Gear Ratios?

Jeff Jewell · 11-07-2017, 09:17 AM

A bunch of years back when I was messing with our A/SA '67 Corvette, I had a glide with a 1.98 low. 1.94 - 1.98 always seemed to be the sweet spot. I broke the planetary at a division race and the only spare I had handy was a 1.82 geared bracket glide. Car left like a turd and lost .04 in 60', but only slowed .02 in ET. Most if not all of the .02 was the bracket trans didn't have the lightweight parts and all the other tricks. While all that gear helps the leave, doesn't really make much of a difference in overall ET.

Your mileage may vary...

11-07-2017, 09:17 AM	#4
Jeff Jewell Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Bangor, PA Posts: 182 Likes: 41 Liked 171 Times in 36 Posts	Re: ET Differences Between Varying Powerglide Low Gear Ratio A bunch of years back when I was messing with our A/SA '67 Corvette, I had a glide with a 1.98 low. 1.94 - 1.98 always seemed to be the sweet spot. I broke the planetary at a division race and the only spare I had handy was a 1.82 geared bracket glide. Car left like a turd and lost .04 in 60', but only slowed .02 in ET. Most if not all of the .02 was the bracket trans didn't have the lightweight parts and all the other tricks. While all that gear helps the leave, doesn't really make much of a difference in overall ET. Your mileage may vary...