|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 820
Likes: 9
Liked 132 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]()
I was told a midplate is just as important as a front engine plate on a "high" horsepower engine (above 800) due to movement in a car on a chassis dyno that didn't have one. I say it's a wives tale being they're not allowed in SS yet there are plenty of 900+ hp engines in SS/B - SS/AH with no problems.
Opinions?
__________________
Gary Smith "another broke racer spectating" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bangor, PA
Posts: 182
Likes: 41
Liked 171 Times in 36 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 709
Likes: 2,663
Liked 238 Times in 111 Posts
|
![]()
Well, I'm a FFFFord guy an as such, Bob Glidden wouldn't use an engine stand. And thats on engine's not running.
__________________
Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jackson, NJ
Posts: 312
Likes: 3
Liked 111 Times in 26 Posts
|
![]()
I run a Front plate and solid steel motor mounts in my SS/AS Mustang and it makes over 900HP, I have not seen any problems as of late.
__________________
Richard Preiser 1613 FGT/I 1510 C/SA 161 F/DA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,576 Times in 581 Posts
|
![]()
The use of a midplate is a plus and if the rules allows it, use it.
It stiffens the chassis and also limits the torsional twist and stresses on both the engine block and transmission. In many cars, it improves the 60' numbers, If you have to use a diaper, it makes the installation and removal easier. It makes engine removal easier too. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 820
Likes: 9
Liked 132 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Gary Smith "another broke racer spectating" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 5
Liked 99 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
SSDivn6 mirrors my feelings.
I think it is a good addition and see no down side to doing so.
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Noble, OK
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() On a similar topic.... "All motor plates, mid-plates, etc. must be separate from and may not be attached to the firewall." Can the mid-plate be bolted to tabs on the front of the chassis and firewall be welded to the outside? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,576 Times in 581 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
For Super Stock class, the firewall and mid-plate must be separate pieces. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Noble, OK
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Does anyone have pictures of a legal firewall in FWD converted modified they wouldn't mind sharing?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|