|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 105
Likes: 191
Liked 55 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
I am beginning to finish my bracket car into a stocker. Its a 1994 - 95 Mustang GT with a 5.0. This was always the plan. I am currently running a C-4 with a Windsor stroker.
I have acquired a Jerico and have a Lakewood bell that needs recertified. My questions are, 1. What clutch is everyone using? 2. I am guessing I need to retain the cable system to actuate the clutch so are there any specific recommendations anyone have for this setup? 3. Do I need to run a diaphragm type clutch or can I run the typical "Soft Loc" clutch? 4. What about throw out bearing? Hydraulic or just a standard with throwout arm? I know this is a lot of questions and I will probably have more but I don't want to buy a bunch of stuff that wont pass tech or simply just not work.
__________________
1967 Fairlane A/Stick - 1994 Mustang GT. 1989 Oldsmobile, R/SA - 2016 Z06 Weekend Street Car. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 314
Liked 1,102 Times in 301 Posts
|
![]()
My Mustang was a 85, but I used the factory style cable clutch setup, and a McLeod Soft Lok unit, 10" diameter. It is my understanding that the 94-5 Mustangs had a 1" longer input shaft, and deeper bellhousing, don`t know if the Jerico and scattershield need to be like that, or if the earlier FOX stup will fit. I can say that a deeper bell would be nice, as the packaging with the clutch fork, and Long style pressure plate required the special thin, cut down clutch fork, adjustable throwout bearing, and an adjustable pivot ball stud. Even still ,it`s very tight in there. I had both the FOX Lakewood and McLeod scattershields in my Mustang, with my Flowtech headers, the McLeod fit perfectly, the Lakewood hit the headers, but not too severely.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 105
Likes: 191
Liked 55 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
I appreciate the info. I used this bell in a 1982 Fox body with no issues. The clutch was a Hays non adjustable. I have the pivot ball installed and it worked good. I was using an old top loader trans in that car though. It was a street car. So it sounds like I will be good with a cable upgrade, firewall adjuster and upgraded pivot on the clutch pedal. I wonder what flywheel weight works good with the little motor?
__________________
1967 Fairlane A/Stick - 1994 Mustang GT. 1989 Oldsmobile, R/SA - 2016 Z06 Weekend Street Car. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 566
Likes: 4,129
Liked 776 Times in 199 Posts
|
![]()
Lee, make sure you replace the plastic clutch cable quadrant under the dash with an aluminum one. The factory plastic ones are junk. We used McCleod clutchs and Youngblood clutchs and Jerico and G-force trans, all worked fine. We had a 95 Cobra R and I think Rory is correct if my memory serves me right, the 94-95 cars do need the inch longer input compared to the 79-93 cars. The lighter the better on the flywheel. You will have to do ALOT of massaging of the trans tunnel if you know what I mean, for these trannys. LOL
Bret Velde 2003 FS/?? |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 232
Likes: 274
Liked 167 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
If he's got a Jerico trans and a Lakewood bellhousing (std. SBF) the different input shaft length of the stock trans would be irrelevant wouldn't it?
__________________
Tim Schmackpfeffer 762 SS Last edited by bykr; 05-26-2020 at 05:41 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Clear Spring, MD
Posts: 193
Likes: 1,458
Liked 77 Times in 15 Posts
|
![]()
Mcleod soft lok, work with black magic clutches. Cale is the best for help and tuning. Single disc set up right will be good and low maintenance.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 314
Liked 1,102 Times in 301 Posts
|
![]()
With the longer input shaft and deeper bellhousing, the 94-5 Mustangs would have the transmission mount about an inch further back. Probably not a big deal to work with. Also since Jericos have multiple shifter mounting holes, the shifter location is also easy to adress.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|